The HIV-Aids virus
Shedding light on the dishonorable record of Dr. Anthony Fauci – A real Dr. Mengle
"If the current AIDS theory and treatment policy are wrong, then to me, it means what Fauci has done over an extended period of time, dwarfs what Dr. Mengele SS Nazi did in his day."
AIDS: Multiple Sex Partners; Multiple STDs; Multiple Antibiotics; MultipleDrugs: Poppers, Cocaine, Heroin, Crac; Multiple infections; Deficient Diet leads to compromised immunity, result = AIDS
It is indisputable
that if an individual homosexual has extremely close contacts with a lot of
people, the number of infectious organisms that this individual’s immune system
is going to have to deal with will be higher.
If this person has 300 sexual contacts a year – with people who themselves are each having 300 contacts a year – that’s 90,000 times more opportunity for infections than a person involved in an exclusive relationship.
In the 1970s, we had a significant number of highly mobile, promiscuous men sharing bodily fluids and fast lifestyles and drugs. It was probable that such homosexuals would be exposed to near every infectious organism that has lived with humans.
Science as it is practiced today in the world is largely not science at all
MY HIV/AIDS INVESTIGATION, AND PARALLELS TO THE COVID HOAX BY JON RAPPORT (March 8, 2021)
In my current series of articles on fake epidemics—Ebola, Zika, Swine Flu—I’ve established that all the symptoms of these so-called diseases can be explained without invoking a virus.
THIS IS A KEY
It was my method, when I wrote my first book, AIDS INC., in 1988. At that time, I looked into the AIDS “high-risk groups” listed by the CDC—Africans, Haitians, IV drug users, gay men, hemophiliacs, and blood-transfusion recipients—and I showed that the immune-system collapse (the hallmark of AIDS) in these groups could be explained without the need to refer to HIV at all.
“AIDS” was not one condition
It was immune-deficiency caused, in various people, by a variety of factors. The hypnotic medical trick was welding all these sick and dying people together under one umbrella label: “AIDS.”
But the truth was—depending on which “AIDS group” and which individuals you were looking at—you had debilitating medical and street drugs destroying immune systems; you had devastating hunger and starvation; lack of basic sanitation; grinding poverty and war; vaccination campaigns; adrenal collapse…
Likewise, today, with a vast relabeling effort, any patient with any sort of lung problem, or flu-like illness, can be diagnosed and repackaged as a case of “COVID-19.” The loosest set of so-called COVID symptoms allows for such fraudulent and deceptive diagnosis.
THIS IS THE CENTRAL CON
Back in 1988, after combing through medical journals, I found that the number-one cause of T-cell depletion (immune-system collapse) in the world was malnutrition/hunger/starvation. Yet, in Africa and Haiti, and even in certain Western patients surviving on junk-food diets, T-cell depletion was routinely called HIV/AIDS.
Suddenly, a virus was invoked to substitute for malnutrition
In fact, in Africa, the earlier label for AIDS was “slim disease.” That fatuous idea was invented via a deeply flawed investigation in Uganda, where the patients were “slim” simply because they were malnourished and starving, and consequently losing weight.
In New York and San Francisco, some gay men were inhaling a brutally dangerous street drug called “poppers.” Severe lung damage has been just one of the drug’s many devastating effects. Profound immune-system deficiency was sure to follow.
In AIDS INC., I laid out a whole parade of immune-system destroyers in the high-risk groups; and none of these destroyers have anything to do with a virus.
—Just as in Wuhan, in 2019, the deadliest chronic air pollution hanging over the city and causing pneumonia—the original hallmark of so-called COVID-19—had nothing to do with a virus.
So when uninformed people bleat, “People are dying, it must be the virus,” whether they’re talking about AIDS or COVID, they’re completely off the rails and on the wrong track.
Here is another parallel between AIDS and COVID: the test for the virus
I’ve spent many articles detailing how the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 spits out false-positive results like water from a fire hose. A doctor will tell a patient he’s infected simply because the sensitivity of the test is so jacked-up it’ll register positive on a speck of dust on the moon. This is an artificial case-number building at its finest.
Well, back in 1988, there was a similar situation. The HIV antibody test was turning out a Niagara of false-positive results. I devoted a chapter in my book to the results of my extensive medical-journal search.
The evidence was undeniable. Both basic types of HIV antibody tests—the Elisa and the Western Blot were admittedly, deeply flawed. There was no gold standard for testing.
Cross-reactions were abundant: the test for HIV would come up positive for a whole host of reasons that had nothing to do with HIV or any other virus.
ONE REASON?
A person had received the hepatitis B vaccination. Well, in the 1980s, a campaign was launched to recruit gay men into a large study of the new vaccine.
A third parallel between AIDS and COVID: expanding the definition of the “disease” in order to rope in as many patients, and build up as many case numbers, as possible.
The 1987 CDC definition of AIDS, which I printed in my book in full, took up 15 pages. With a bit of a rigmarole, a doctor could diagnose AIDS in a person who had almost any kind of bacterial infection.
The CDC definition of COVID-19 allows a diagnosis when the patient has nothing more than a cough, or chills and fever, accompanied by a positive PCR test.
There are other parallels between AIDS and COVID I could list, but you get the picture. In both instances, the hoax is rampant.
A few years after I
published AIDS INC., I became aware of a new argument: the
very existence of HIV was in doubt. Consulting the independent literature on
the subject, I became convinced no one has proven HIV existed.
In these pages, I’ve published, several times, an illuminating interview journalist Christine Johnson conducted with Australian biophysicist, Eleni Papadopulos, about HIV isolation. Papadopulos makes a compelling case that, according to rigorous rules laid down by mainstream researchers, HIV hasn’t been isolated.
As my readers know, for the past year I’ve been offering compelling evidence that SARS-COV-2 has never been proven to exist. Researchers twist and reverse the meaning of the word “isolation,” in order to “demonstrate” the virus is real.
The non-existence of HIV and SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t surprise me. After all, the so-called symptoms of both “conditions” can be explained without reference to a virus.
In both cases, the reality, which lights up like a giant neon sign in the darkness is FRAUD.
KARY MULLIS, NOBEL PRIZE WINNER IN CHEMISTRY
The following was written by Kary Mullis for the introduction to the book "Inventing the AIDS Virus" by Peter H. Duesberg (Regnery Publishing, INC; Washington, DC, 1996):
In 1988 I was working as a consultant at Specialty Labs in Santa Monica, CA, setting up analytic routines for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). I knew a lot about setting up analytic routines for anything with nucleic acids in it because I invented the Polymerase Chain Reaction. That's why they hired me.
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), on the other the hand was something I did not know a lot about. Thus, when I found myself writing a report on our progress and goals for the project, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, I recognized that I did not know the scientific reference to support a statement I had just written: "HIV is the probable cause of AIDS."
So I turned to the a virologist at the next desk, a reliable and competent fellow, and asked him for
the reference. He said I didn't need one. I disagreed. While it's true that
certain scientific discoveries or techniques are so well established that their
sources are no longer referenced in the contemporary literature, that didn't
seem to be the case with the HIV/AIDS connection.
It was totally remarkable to me that the individual who had discovered the cause of a deadly and as-yet-uncured disease would not be continually referenced in the scientific papers until that disease was cured and forgotten. But as I would soon learn, the name of that individual - who would surely be Nobel material - was on the tip of no one's tongue.
Of course, this simple reference had to be out there
somewhere. Otherwise, tens of thousands of public servants and esteemed
scientists of many callings, trying to solve the tragic deaths of a large
number of homosexual and/or intravenous (IV) drug-using men between the ages of
twenty-five and forty, would not have allowed their research to settle into one narrow channel of investigation.
Everyone wouldn't fish in the same pond unless it was well established that all the other ponds were empty. There had to be a published paper, or perhaps several of them, which taken together indicated that HIV was the probable cause of AIDS. There just had to be.
I did computer searches but came up with nothing. Of course, you can miss something important in computer searches by not putting in just the right keywords. To be certain about a scientific issue, it's best to ask other scientists directly. That's one thing that scientific conferences in faraway places with nice beaches are for.
I was going to a lot of meetings and conferences as part of my job. I got in the habit of approaching anyone who gave a talk about AIDS and asking him or her what reference I should quote for that increasingly problematic statement, "HIV is the probable cause of AIDS."
After ten or fifteen meetings over a couple years, I was getting pretty upset when no one could cite the reference. I didn't like the ugly conclusion that was forming in my mind: The entire campaign against a disease increasingly regarded as a twentieth-century Black Plague was based on a hypothesis whose origins no one could recall. That defied both scientific and common sense.
Finally, I had an opportunity to question one of the giants in HIV and AIDS research, DL Luc Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute, when he gave a talk in San Diego. It would be the last time I would be able to ask my little question without showing anger, and I figured Montagnier would know the answer. So I asked him.
With a look of condescending puzzlement, Montagnier said, "Why don't you quote the report from the Centers for Disease Control? "
I replied, "It doesn't really address the issue of whether or not HIV is the probable cause of AIDS, does it?"
"No," he admitted, no doubt wondering when I would just go away. He looked for support to the little circle of people around him, but they were all awaiting a more definitive response like I was.
"Why don't you quote the work on SIV [Simian Immunodeficiency Virus]?" the good doctor offered.
"I read that too, DL Montagnier," I responded. "What happened to those monkeys didn't remind me of AIDS. Besides, that paper was just published only a couple of months ago. I'm looking for the original paper where somebody showed that HIV caused AIDS.
This time, DL Montagnier's response was to walk quickly away to greet an acquaintance across the room.
Cut to the scene inside my car just a few years ago. I was
driving from Mendocino to San Diego. Like everyone else by now, I knew a lot
more about AIDS than I wanted to. But I still didn't know who had determined
that it was caused by HIV. Getting sleepy as I came over the San Bernardino
Mountains, I switched on the radio and tuned in a guy who was talking about
AIDS.
His name was Peter Duesberg, and he was a prominent virologist at
Berkeley. I'd heard of him, but had never read his papers or heard him speak.
But I listened, now wide awake, while he explained exactly why I was having so
much trouble finding the references that linked HIV to AIDS. There weren't any.
No one had ever proved that HIV causes AIDS.
When I got home, I invited Duesberg down to San Diego to present his ideas to a meeting of the American Association for Chemistry. Mostly skeptical at first, the audience stayed for the lecture, and then an hour of questions, and then stayed talking to each other until requested to clear the room. Everyone left with more questions than they had brought.
I like and respect Peter Duesberg. I don't think he knows necessarily what causes AIDS; we have disagreements about that. But we're both certain about what doesn't cause AIDS.
We have not been able to discover any good reasons why most of the people on earth believe that AIDS is a disease caused by a virus called HIV. There is simply no scientific evidence demonstrating that this is true.
We have also not been able to discover why doctors prescribe a toxic drug called AZT (Zidovudine) to people who have no other complaint other than the fact that they have the presence of antibodies to HIV in their blood. In fact, we cannot understand why humans would take this drug for any reason.
We cannot understand how all this madness came about and having both lived in Berkeley, we've seen some strange things indeed. We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake.
I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time.
SHEDDING LIGHT ON THE DISHONORABLE RECORD OF DR. FAUCI – A REAL DR. MENGLE
By F. William Engdahl
Dramatic political and social decisions are being made across the United States and around the world on what emergency quarantine measures and
other steps must be taken. In many cases, the radical and severe measures, such
as shutting down the world economy, are being justified by the COVID-19 case
projections of morbidity in the future.
If there is one person who is the face of the current strategy of dealing with the coronavirus in Washington it is the Director of the US National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the NIH, Dr. Tony Fauci.
What major media conveniently leave out in discussing Fauci’s role is his highly controversial and conflicted history since he first joined NIAID in 1984 during the beginnings of the AIDS panic. His role then sheds valuable light on his remarkable and highly controversial actions today.
Tony Fauci, a leading member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force is being promoted by major US media such as CNN, MSNBC, or the New York Times as the greatest expert on all related to the Covid19 outbreak.
He had dismissed the
President’s efforts to promote a known malaria medication as treatment for
severe corona patients as “anecdotal,” even though seven years before he
backed the same drug.
He has publicly taken projections from an institute created in Washington State by the Gates Foundation, the same foundation that virtually owns the WHO and owns major stakes in the leading vaccine makers, to claim that up to 200,000 Americans could die from COVID19.
Fauci stated that COVID19 is “probably about
10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu,” which would mean 300-600,000
coronavirus deaths this year, at the same time in a respected medical journal he compared Covid-19 as similar to seasonal flu in morbidity.
When questioned how long the shutdown of much of the US economy must last, Fauci replied only when there is zero new covid19 positive tested cases, something impossible given the defective testing. He has also backed direct human tests of novel vaccines with no prior animal tests, including radical non-tested mRNA gene-edited vaccines.
Fauci has more influence over US national policy on the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic than anyone, including the President. Much of the media treat him with awe as an unimpeachable scientist, one of the world’s finest. A closer look at Anthony Fauci’s career gives a starkly different picture, a very alarming one in fact.
America’s AIDS Czar
Tony Fauci has held the top post at the NIAID in Washington for an astonishing 36 years. Today he is well past retirement age at 79 and holds the funds to determine which drug companies or university researchers will get precious government funds or not from NIAID’s annual $5 billion budget.
Dr. Robert Gallo
Let’s go back to
1984 when Fauci was named head of NIAID during the Reagan era. That year an
AIDS researcher, Robert Gallo, working under Fauci, held a press conference to
announce that he had “discovered” the AIDS virus. He said it was HIV- human
immunodeficiency virus.
The shocking announcement, which went around the world was in complete disregard of scientific procedures of prior peer-reviewed published scientific evidence, including the required electron microscope analyses.
It was a case of
“science by press conference” as a critical scientist, Prof. Peter H.
Duesberg described it. Duesberg was an award-winning researcher at Berkeley, who isolated the first cancer gene through his work on retroviruses in 1970 and
mapped the genetic structure of these viruses.
For Gallo and Fauci,
that was unimportant as millions in research funds flowed into NIAID to
research the new virus, HIV. Fauci and Gallo claimed that AIDS was highly
contagious, also by sexual transmission, especially among homosexual men.
Notably, before the
Gallo claims to have found the HIV AIDS virus, NIAID had been doing
research on the role of drugs, poppers or nitrites, proven immune-suppressants,
in the deaths of the earliest AIDS patients. That was quickly dropped in favor
of researching a “cure” for AIDS. The media were told that AIDS was the “public health threat of the Century.”
Gallo went on to make millions on his patented blood test for HIV, despite the fact that the test was often giving false positives and did not test directly for the alleged virus, but for active antibodies, something immunology practice said was not valid, as antibodies merely suggested a past infection response and not necessarily presence of HIV. At this time in the 1980s, Fauci was responsible for AIDS research at NIAID, a post he still holds.
False Tests?
The issue of HIV/AIDS tests are central. While a frightening world was clamoring for a test, Gallo and Fauci promoted their deeply flawed tests of antibodies. In 2006 Gallo claimed, “HIV tests were highly accurate from the time they were developed in 1984 and have become much more accurate over time…”
Highly accurate in 1984 but more accurate than highly over time? Gallo added in response to criticism, “A PCR test for the presence of the virus itself can accurately determine a child’s HIV status.”
In a sharp rebuttal
of the Gallo claims, claims endorsed by Fauci and the NIAID as well as CDC,
Roberto A. Giraldo, MD and Etienne de Harven, MD, the scientist who produced
the first electron micrograph of a retrovirus pointed out that both the ELISA
and Western blot, and a genetic test, the PCR or ‘Viral Load’ test,” the two
major tests used to determine if one has AIDS, are invalid.
“None of these tests detect the HIV virus itself, nor do they detect HIV particles.” They add that there are “more than 70 different documented conditions that can cause the antibody tests to react positively without an HIV infection.”
Among the false-positive cases are influenza, the common cold, leprosy, or the existence of pregnancy. The same tests are used today to determine SARS-CoV-2-positive.
They concluded,
“The fact that after 25 years of intense research HIV has been neither isolated nor purified in terms of classical virology indicate to us that the infectious view of AIDS as a contagious viral disease is based on an apparently non-existent microbe!”
Giraldo and de Harven declared, “The alleged existence of HIV was asserted from the study of proteins, reverse transcriptase activity (RT), and RNA fragments that were found in culture supernatants, not from the direct analysis of purified viral particles.” The CDC requires a positive antibody test for HIV to determine AIDS in the USA. Yet in Africa since 1985 the WHO requires no HIV test or any other laboratory test. Merely the patient’s symptoms that can include weight loss, chronic diarrhea, prolonged fever, persistent cough and such, symptoms endemic to chronic poverty, malnutrition and lack of sanitation.
Yet this fraud has shaped the career of Tony Fauci for more than 35 years. Fauci as head of NIAID has taken millions from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well as the Clinton Foundation along with tens of billions from US taxpayers for this bogus research. Suspiciously, the 2006 article by Giraldo and de Harven was suddenly retracted by the journal in 2019 just before the coronavirus Wuhan outbreak.
Despite the fact that he knew the established rules of virology, Fauci, as head of NIAID, recommended the Burroughs Wellcome chemotherapy drug, AZT as a “preventive drug” for HIV diagnosed patients even without symptoms! Burroughs Wellcome gave NIAID the study that was deliberately biased for AZT.
Fauci even backed AZT for pregnant women despite the grave risk to the fetus. One mark of pregnancy in all women is a higher level of antigens as the natural immune system fights any infection to protect the fetus. AZT or Retrovir, a failed leukemia drug, has been proven to be a highly toxic drug.
It was approved for AIDS testing in a record 5 days by Fauci and the US Government in 1987. Today, despite more than thirty years of funding research and billions of dollars, no effective vaccine for HIV/AIDS exists.
Fauci and Gilead
According to people who have studied the role of Tony Fauci as head of NIAID, his focus has been what is called scientific reductivism, described as “a 19 Century-style, single-germ theory for a complex web of factors that collapsed the immune systems of a subset of gay men in the early 1980s.”
He has refused to explore the documentation that a variety of lethal drugs and other toxins such as nitrites could play a role. As a result, he has wasted tens of billions of taxpayer dollars since 1984 on dead-end experiments. One of his most nefarious was his collaboration with Gilead Sciences.
Not satisfied with having developed a false positive test for AIDS and having gained FDA fast-track approval for AZT to treat HIV-positive patients with serious illness symptoms, Fauci decided to collaborate with Gilead (as in the Biblical “balm of Gilead”) on what came to be called PrEP experiments.
Fauci promoted Truvada (AZT) as a prophylactic to the AIDS virus
Fauci in 2007 began to finance, clinical trials of the AZT drugs in HIV “negatives,” on
the theory the chemotherapy would “protect” them from
becoming “positive.” That is, testing toxic HIV drugs on
otherwise healthy persons to “insure” they never got AIDS.
If it sounds mad, it
was. Gilead supplied the drug, Truvada, to NIAID between 2007-2012 for Phase
III human tests for HIV-negative subjects. Four tests of at least 2,000 and up
to 5,000 test subjects each, were done.
The project was called “pre-exposure prophylaxis” or “PrEP.” Healthy subjects were given doses of chemotherapy drug Truvada on the thesis it could prevent them from one day getting HIV-positive. CDC, in its May 2014 recommendation urged physicians to prescribe Truvada for negatives in the so-called “risk groups,” an official government imprimatur for an extremely profitable drug.
The FDA ignored two of the four Truvada tests that had failed and been halted. Despite that and owing to data manipulation by Fauci’s NIAID and Gilead, the FDA approved the dangerous Truvada for PrEP. Today Gilead lists the side effects of Truvada:
Kidney problems, including kidney failure; worsening Hepatitis B; too much lactic acid in your blood (lactic acidosis), which can lead to death; severe liver problems, which can lead to death; bone problems.
They state that Truvada:
“can help reduce the risk of getting HIV-1 through sex, when taken every day and used together with safer sex practices.”
The Fauci-Gilead scam of promoting Truvada for healthy people to “reduce risk” of HIV is a marker for the level of medical malpractice and in some cases evident criminal abuse of human health that the current White House coronavirus guru, A. Fauci represents.
Fauci and COVID-19
In October, 2019 Fauci and his NIAID got $100 million from the Gates Foundation to develop “gene-based” therapies for HIV and sickle cell disease. That means at the time of the first claims of novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China, Fauci was still promoting a 35-year fraud around HIV.
Fauci is also part of the Gates Foundation cabal. In 2012 Fauci was named one of the five Leadership Council of the Gates Foundation-created Global Vaccine Action Plan.
This is highly relevant to his role today as the Trump Administration coronavirus “pope.” Has his NIAID or any other laboratory in the world rigorously, with electron microscopy, isolated and purified samples of patients tested SARS-CoV-2 positive for Covid-19? Or are the virus proofs as faulty as Fauci and the AIDS clique have made for HIV?
In addition, NIAID is working with Gilead to conduct Phase II human trials on Gilead’s drug, remdesivir, as a potential treatment for hospitalized adult patients, diagnosed with COVID-19.
A Coincidence?
Relevant also is the fact that all top scientific advisers to the US President’s Task Force on COVID-19 are tied for decades to the bogus and destructive HIV/AIDS research and propagation of false theories. Alongside Tony Fauci of NIAID stands Deborah L. Birx, M.D., Obama appointee as US Global AIDS Coordinator who worked under Tony Fauci at NIAID from 1983-1986.
Robert Redfield is the current Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the center of the recent coronavirus testing scandal. Redfield cofounded with the discredited Robert Gallo, a former Fauci colleague in the AIDS scandals of the early 1980s at NIH, the Institute of Human Virology based at the University of Maryland. Redfield and Birx also co-authored numerous scientific articles on purported HIV vaccines, none of which have been effective.
Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Fauci, Birx and Redfield, all incestuously complicit in the HIV/AIDS frauds and malpractice, today holds the future of not only American public health but also of the entire world economy in their hands. Not a good situation.
As they work on the proved HIV=IDS fraud shows, the coronavirus tests do not at all prove the presence of a deadly virus in any patient. If this is so, it is perhaps the greatest criminal fraud in medical history.
F. William Engdahl is a strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
COMMENT:
Gary Wilson • 10 months ago
In 1992 I first
learned about AIDS by buying the book, "The Great Aids Hoax", by
T.C. Fry. I contacted Mr. Fry by phone and had an interesting conversation. He
stated that he also found the conversation interesting. I then contacted Peter
Duesberg by email and in it I asked him how he liked being a modern-day
Galileo.
He actually phoned
me and he sent me a large body of evidence to review. I also bought Robert
Gallo's book about aids, "Virus Hunting". Based on
the evidence from Gallo and Duesberg, I came to the conclusion that HIV cannot cause AIDS. For me to change my opinion, I would need to read
a published, peer-reviewed study proving that HIV causes Aids.
There is no such
study. I attended a talk by Kary Mullis when he came to town. In his talk, he
mentioned that when he was applying for a grant to study HIV, he asked what the
scientific reference was for HIV as the cause of AIDS. When he found that there
was no scientific reference he declined to apply for the grant.
I made 25 or so copies of Duesberg's body of evidence and talked to many local AIDS organizations leaving them a copy of Duesberg's body of evidence. It was clear to me that my effort made no difference to their opinion. I found people often attacked Duesberg, but never attacked his evidence. I guess when you can't refute the evidence, you attack the person.
I certainly know from my investigations who Fauci is. All treatment for AIDS is directed at the virus and the treatments are toxic and immune-suppressing. These treatments are given to immune-deficient patients!
The immune deficiency in AIDS is acquired, which means you were not born with it. It doesn't mean you were infected with it by another person.
If the current AIDS theory and treatment policy is wrong, then to me, it means what Fauci has done over an extended period of time dwarfs what Dr. Mengele SS Nazi did in his day.
When Fauci is the leading expert on COVID-19, you don't need to tell me something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
BILL GATES' EBOLA CONFESSION WHICH WAS IGNORED BY THE MEDIA (Sunday, February 19, 2017)
Bill Gates: The incarnation of Dr. Jekyll among us?
“We’ve created, in terms of spread, the most dangerous environment that we’ve ever had in the history of mankind,”- Gates tells Vox.
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates argues that something is going to desecrate humans, killing millions. It’s not nuclear war. In an exclusive interview with Ezra Klein in Vox, Gates said, “I rate the chance of a nuclear war within my lifetime as being fairly low.”
It’s also not a “big volcanic explosion, gigantic earthquake, [or an] asteroid,” because the probability is, as he said, “very low.”
So what’s going to kill us? Gates predicts a virus or some sort of outbreak.
On Ebola, Bill Gates said “We’ve created, in terms of spread, the most dangerous environment that we’ve ever had in the history of mankind,”- Gates tells Vox. And also said:
“I rate the chance of a widespread epidemic, far worse than Ebola, in my lifetime, as well over 50%.”
Some comments are incriminating and can put someone in an awkward position. Every intelligent person or the media could gather evidence of the statement by the 59 years old successful businessman that Ebola was created.
Like always, the aim of the media today is to misinform, to manipulate, twist and hide facts from the public over diseases just to keep their jobs to feed their families. The implicating statement was let go by the media without questioning Gates.
Showing concern over a possible outbreak of a disease in the next few decades, Bill Gates said “I rate the chance of a nuclear war within my lifetime as being fairly low. I rate the chance of a widespread epidemic, far worse than Ebola, in my lifetime, as well over 50%.”
“It’s especially terrifying, given the way we reacted to the last epidemic: The Ebola outbreak of last year showed how unready the world is dealing with infectious disease.”
“The last widespread killer epidemic was the Spanish Flu. Between 1918 and 1919, it killed between 20 million and 40 million people worldwide, more than World War I. What’s even more frightening, Gates says, is that we don’t even know where the Spanish Flu came from, it was just called the “Spanish Flu” because the press in Spain were the first to report on it.”
The need for Bill
Gates to be worried is necessary. I quote: “We don’t know where the Spanish Flu came from, it was just called “The
Spanish Flu” because the press in Spain were the first to report on it.”
But certainly, Bill Gates knew where Ebola came from because the virus was
created by America, Russia, and Germany for biological warfare purpose, long
before it exploded in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Congo, and Guinea.
I wasn’t surprised
at all when the business tycoon ended his talks with Vox, saying “We’ve
created, in terms of spread, the most dangerous environment that we’ve ever had
in the history of mankind.”
Let World Leaders and America continue to fool the people, but they can’t
continue fooling the people all the time. Over the truth of Aids and Ebola,
time will tell.
Posted by Johan van Dongen/ Joel Savage/ Wolff Geisler at 2:51 AM Labels: Bill Gates, Biological warfare, Ebola, Ezra Klein,
No comments:
Post a Comment