France’s cost‑of‑living crisis has exploded into
violent unrest, revealing a deeper truth that Europe can no longer ignore:
economic pressure is now a security threat. What began as frustration over
rising food prices, unaffordable housing, and stagnant wages has transformed
into a nationwide eruption of anger, destruction, and confrontation.
The International Criminal Court (ICC), for more than two decades, has stood as the world’s most recognized institution for prosecuting genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Yet its credibility has been repeatedly questioned, especially by developing nations and African states that felt disproportionately targeted.
Ursula von der Leyen has emerged as one of the most influential women in modern global politics, leading the European Commission with a combination of resilience, strategic clarity, and historic significance.
As the first woman to hold this office and recently reelected for a second term lasting until 2029, she stands at the center of Europe’s response to some of the most challenging events of the 21st century.
The International Criminal Court (ICC), established in 2002, has served as the world’s primary institution for prosecuting genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Its mandate was clear: no matter how powerful a nation or leader may be, justice must remain universal.
Yet, from its inception, the ICC’s record has been heavily criticized, especially by African nations, for disproportionately targeting leaders from the Global South while avoiding cases involving powerful Western countries. This imbalance led several African states to withdraw from the ICC, arguing that the ICC had become an instrument of selective justice rather than a guardian of global accountability.
When U.S. President Donald Trump declared that “No American leader has done what I have done for Israel,” he revealed more than pride. He exposed a long‑standing pattern of pressure from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The United Kingdom has been experiencing an unusual political pattern for more than a decade. Prime Ministers entering No. 10 Downing Street with great expectations, only to resign far sooner than expected.
Libya’s collapse and Iranian protests are shown in a
split-scene illustration of war and resistance.
Iran was already going through one of the most difficult times in its recent history before the war broke out. In January 2026, widespread protests had begun, initially motivated by intense economic dissatisfaction.
The national currency was still depreciating, inflation had
risen to all-time highs, and business owners, particularly those in Tehran's Grand
Bazaar, were among the first to openly express their outrage.
From Economic Anger to Political Defiance
What began as economic discontent quickly evolved into a
nationwide political movement. Demonstrators shifted from criticizing
government policies to openly demanding the end of the Islamic Republic. Chants
such as “Death to the Dictator,” directed at Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei,
echoed across major cities. Some protesters even called for the return of Reza
Pahlavi, the exiled son of the former Shah, as a possible alternative to the
current system.
By early February 2026, the unrest had intensified. Students
joined the demonstrations, accusing the regime of holding their future
“hostage.” Nightly rooftop chants became a symbolic act of civil disobedience.
The government responded with force, violent crackdowns, internet shutdowns,
and mass arrests, further fueling public resentment. All of this occurred
before the U.S.–Israeli military operations and the assassination of Khamenei
that later escalated into open conflict.
Trump’s Miscalculation: Expecting Iranians to Support
Intervention
Amid this internal instability, President Donald Trump
viewed Iran as vulnerable. Believing the population was ready to overthrow its
leaders, he aligned with Israel to strike Iran, expecting that military
pressure would trigger a popular uprising. Trump publicly framed the
intervention as an effort to “help the Iranian people achieve the change they
have long desired.” But the outcome was the opposite of what he anticipated.
Instead of rising against their government, many Iranians reacted with anger toward the foreign attack and the killing of their spiritual leader. Even those who had criticized the regime felt that Iran’s sovereignty had been violated.
The support for Trump’s actions came mainly from longtime opponents of the Islamic Republic living abroad, including political asylum
seekers in the United States, not from the
Iranian population inside the country.
The Libya Factor: A Warning Etched in Memory
A major reason for this unexpected unity was historical memory. Iranians vividly remember what happened to Libya, another oil‑rich nation, after foreign intervention. Muammar Gaddafi’s removal was initially celebrated by some Libyans, but the country soon descended into chaos, civil war, and fragmentation.
Many Iranians fear that foreign‑engineered regime change would
lead to the same fate: instability, foreign exploitation, and the loss of
national control over their resources.
This comparison resonated deeply. To many Iranians, the
attack on their country looked less like a humanitarian mission and more like a
geopolitical strategy centered on oil and regional dominance. The lesson from
Libya was clear: foreign intervention rarely brings democracy, but it often
brings destruction.
A Strategy That Backfired
The U.S. plan to leverage internal unrest and topple the
Iranian government with public support ultimately failed. Instead of weakening
the regime, the attack strengthened nationalist sentiment and pushed many
Iranians, regardless of political views, to reject Trump’s call for regime
change. The expectation that Iranians would welcome foreign involvement proved
to be a profound miscalculation.
Moral Lesson: Nations Remember, and History Shapes
Resistance
The Iranian response shows that people do not easily forget
the consequences of past foreign interventions. Libya’s collapse became a
cautionary tale, teaching Iranians that external promises of “liberation” can
mask deeper strategic interests. When nations witness the suffering of others,
they become more determined to protect their own sovereignty, even if they
oppose their leaders.
The moral lesson is simple: true change must come from within a nation, not from the ambitions of foreign powers. History has shown that when outside forces attempt to impose political outcomes, the result is often instability, resentment, and long‑term suffering. Iranians chose to remember Libya, and that memory reshaped their destiny.
Trump in profile against a faint outline of Cuba, symbolizing shifting policy focus.
When Donald Trump declared that “after Iran, Cuba is the
next to go down pretty soon,” he revealed far more than a foreign‑policy
intention. His words exposed a deeper ambition: the desire to achieve what no
American president has ever accomplished. Trump has always positioned himself
as a leader who wants to break records, defy precedents, and inscribe his name
in the annals of American history.
His posture toward Cuba fits neatly into that pattern. It is
less about “making America great again” and more about doing what past American leaders failed to do. This
ambition is not new. On January 5, 2026, I published an article titled “Fidel
Castro: The Man America Couldn’t Capture.” That piece detailed the long,
frustrating history of U.S. attempts to subdue Cuba politically, economically,
and militarily.
From the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 to more than 600
documented assassination attempts on Fidel Castro, the United States invested
enormous resources in trying to topple the Cuban Revolution. Yet, despite its
global power, Washington never succeeded. Castro died peacefully in his bed,
and Cuba remained defiantly independent. Trump’s recent rhetoric suggests he
wants to rewrite that chapter.
Related article: Fidel
Castro: The Man America Couldn't Capture
For him, Cuba represents unfinished business, an unresolved
symbol of American limits. By threatening to “bring Cuba down,” Trump is
signaling that he intends to accomplish what Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson,
Nixon, Reagan, and every president after them could not. In his political
worldview, conquering Cuba would not simply be a foreign‑policy
victory; it would be a personal triumph, a historical milestone that
distinguishes him from all his predecessors.
To understand the weight of Trump’s statement, one must
revisit the long arc of U.S.–Cuba relations. Since 1959, Cuba has been a
geopolitical thorn in Washington’s side. It aligned with the Soviet Union
during the Cold War, hosted nuclear missiles that nearly triggered World War
III, and became a symbol of resistance for oppressed nations worldwide.
The U.S. responded with a decades‑long embargo,
covert operations, propaganda campaigns, and diplomatic isolation. Yet none of
these strategies broke the Cuban government. Even after the Cold War ended,
Cuba remained a stubborn outlier. Presidents Clinton and Obama attempted
cautious engagement, while others maintained pressure. But no administration
ever claimed the ability, or the intention, to “bring Cuba down.”
Trump’s language, therefore, marks a dramatic escalation,
one that echoes the interventionist mindset of the early 20th century when the
U.S. frequently overthrew governments in Latin America. What makes Trump’s
posture even more striking is the timing. Cuba today is economically fragile,
politically strained, and facing one of its most difficult periods since the
1990s.
The island’s shortages, blackouts, and mass emigration have
weakened public confidence. For a leader like Trump, who thrives on symbolic
victories, Cuba may appear to be a vulnerable target, an opportunity to achieve
a historic breakthrough. However, history also teaches that Cuba is not easily
subdued. The island has survived invasions, embargoes, and the collapse of its
strongest ally, the Soviet Union.
Its resilience is woven into its national identity. Any
attempt to “bring Cuba down” would likely provoke regional backlash,
international condemnation, and unpredictable consequences. Trump’s statement,
therefore, raises critical questions about the future of U.S. foreign policy.
Is this a genuine strategic plan, or is it another example of Trump’s desire to
craft a legacy that overshadows all previous presidents?
Is Cuba being targeted because of geopolitical calculations or because it represents a symbolic prize that past leaders failed to capture? What
is clear is that Trump’s rhetoric signals a shift from traditional diplomacy
toward a more personal, legacy‑driven approach. For him,
conquering Cuba would not just be a policy achievement; it would
be a historical conquest, a final chapter in a story that began long before he
entered politics.
As the world watches, one thing is certain: Cuba remains a
stage where American presidents test their power, their ideology, and their
place in history. Trump now appears determined to write his own chapter, one
that could reshape the Caribbean and redefine America’s role in the region. However,
the truth is that war can’t make a great leader. If Donald Trump truly wants to be remembered
as a great American leader, then pursuing war, especially against a small,
struggling nation like Cuba, cannot be the path.
History has shown repeatedly that war does not elevate a
nation; it drains it. It does not strengthen a leader’s legacy; it stains it, and
it does not make a country “great again”; it burdens future generations with
trauma, debt, and global resentment. Greatness is not measured by how many
countries a president threatens or conquers. It is measured by how many crises
he prevents, how many lives he protects, and how many bridges he builds.
A leader who seeks greatness through war is not building a legacy; he is building a catastrophe. There are several reasons why war cannot serve as a foundation for greatness: war creates suffering on all sides, and more importantly, America’s greatest presidents are remembered for peace, not destruction.
The US president, Donald Trump
The experience of studying the US government has been unique
for me as an African writer. My perspective differs greatly from the
justifications offered by the US government for every war against nations it views
as enemies. What does Trump really want in Venezuela, which is why Nicolás
Maduro was attacked and taken prisoner?
The US president claims that because Maduro is a drug
dealer, the Venezuelan leader poses a threat to the US. The US government's
first aim is to combat drugs and dismantle the network. Experts, however, think
that the discussion of combating narcotics is a smoke screen. So, is the main
goal to control Venezuela's oil reserves?
Even if I don't know much about the US government, I can
still talk about American presidents. They don't waste time attacking a
government since they are fully aware that they will not benefit from that
nation. Trump recently attacked terrorists in Nigeria who were murdering
Christians. Since that nation possesses oil, he took that action.
Trump won't waste time bombing terrorists in Nigeria if
oranges are that nation's main resource. I have the same thought about
Venezuela. Trump wants the world and Maduro's adversaries to think he is on
their side. That might not be the reason for his attack, though.
During his 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump made
numerous claims that he could put a stop to the conflict between Russia and
Ukraine within a day of taking office; however, he failed. So I don’t understand
why Trump should start a new conflict with Venezuela when the
Israeli-Palestinian problem is still raging on.
As previously stated, I'm not sure if the attack on Venezuela is related to drugs, but I can say that Trump feels he has failed in many areas and that he urgently has to impress the American citizens.
The
Russian leader, Vladimir Putin, is not responsible for the Russian-Ukraine war,
the real enemies are the US government
"Russia Attacks Ukraine." is the headline in every newspaper across the world, while people are calling the Russian leader, Vladimir Putin, an evil man and a murderer. Which superpower country in the world has murdered more people and committed so many crimes against humanity than the United States of America? The US government's actions led to the war, Putin needs to defend his country and he did it right.
That’s how
hypocrites and selfish people who often listen to one side of a story react and
begin to spread false propaganda against others. Before people accuse Vladimir
Putin of attacking Ukraine, they must first try to find out the reason behind
the man’s actions.
If African
leaders were like Putin, the continent would not have suffered much. Many
African leaders are so stupid to the extent that they will accept money for
every proposal by foreign countries in Africa, even if that will threaten the
lives of their citizens.
As we know,
many African countries have permitted the US government to build military bases
in their countries because they believe America will prevent or fight terrorism
on the shores of Africa. That’s a very big mistake. The Russian leader will
never let that happen.
Russia,
China, North Korea, etc., are three countries that pose a threat to the US
government, just as Libya was a threat to the US government. Through the
National Alliance Treaty Organization—NATO, Libya was attacked and Khadafy was
killed. Today, Libya, once the wealthiest African country, is in ruins.
Since Russia
has been America’s enemy for a very long time, NATO has been in an alliance
with several European countries near Russia, and now they are determined to
occupy Ukraine because they want to join NATO. This will be the biggest mistake
any intelligent leader that considers America or NATO a threat can make.
Putin knows
America wants to use NATO to attack Russia and that plan can easily be achieved since Ukraine and Russia share common borders. This is what
Vladimir Putin wishes to avoid to protect Russian citizens.
If African
leaders who have allowed US military bases in their countries realize the folly
of their actions, it is too late. Time will tell.
The
continent of Africa is not a threat to terrorists for African leaders to be
tricked by the US government to build their military bases across Africa. They
did that because of African resources.
The world is
rapidly changing and pressure continues to pile up on Africa from both Europe
and the United States of America because of the continent’s vast resources.
Therefore, those military bases were set up to quell any uprising.
The US
always poses a threat to terrorists. We witnessed what happened on September
11, and therefore, it doesn’t make sense for the US government to build its
military bases in Africa to fight terrorists for Africans.
Who cares
about Africa anyway? It’s because of our resources. Africans have been victims
of slavery, colonial brutalities, Apartheid, and many man-made diseases. There
are a lot of things African leaders can learn from the Russian-Ukraine war.
That is how
the war began
NATO has
already expanded throughout Europe and now wants to occupy Ukraine, this is
something Putin will prevent to protect his country and the people
If you look
at the position of Russia on the map, you can see that the country is
surrounded by NATO. It has expanded its positions around Russia, which
means that in no time, Russia may fall into the hands of the US government.
Every wise
leader must protect their citizens, and since Putin is not an African leader,
he did the right thing, so people should stop judging him when our porous
borders have invited every criminal, including armed robbers to enter Ghana
and terrorize Ghanaians.
The West and
the US government have never changed their behavior when Russia becomes the
subject. This can be seen as the US President, Joe Biden, and the European
leaders started with the threats of sanctions against Russia, but Putin is not
the kind of leader that can be intimidated by sanctions.
Just think about the position Putin stands for. If you are a president, will you allow your enemy to occupy a country you share common borders to attack you? Don't be too judgmental. Putin has the right to defend his country and the people.
Politicians, health institutions, and rich people are involved in today's crimes against humanity.
Many attribute crimes in society and against humanity to poverty, unemployment, and the lack of education. However, many educated people, including politicians, members of the royal family, upper-class people in society, reputable health institutions, and companies, are behind horrendous crimes against humanity today.
The lifestyle of politicians and members of royal families can be envied. They travel around the world and attend social gatherings. And dress in modern, wealthy outfits, yet many are miserable like a church mouse.
Some become alcoholic and depressed because they champion false causes under a pretense. They lie about everything, including diseases and biological weapons against humanity.
The status of a politician, member of a royal family, or rich person doesn’t make them special; in fact, history reveals the crimes the United States, Belgium, Holland, France, Germany, and health institutions, such as the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control, have committed against humanity.
Terrorism is considered a very serious crime by any government. Belgium, the United States of America, and several other countries have people they consider dangerous terrorists behind bars.
They claim they want to make this world safe, yet it’s shocking if you analyze the crimes the same governments have committed against humanity with impunity, and they think it's appropriate to declare war on those who write the truth.
Wealthy heirs, respected members of royal families, politicians, and successful businessmen act like real criminals, supporting and committing crimes both politically and medically against humanity, while they desperately try to shift the attention of the general public to false causes or origins of those crimes.
I don’t know who to share my grief with; for decades, I haven’t committed any crime in the country where I live. I am just a common African writer not interested in crimes, yet the fears of being exposed have propelled certain social media, politicians, and the Google search engine company to treat me like a criminal because of the truth I write.
You politicians, health institutions, journalists, Google, etc, all of you claim to play a role in fighting crimes against humanity, but why do you oppress me for writing the truth as my part in fighting against crimes in society? It doesn’t make sense.
You can’t tell the world you are fighting against crime while you suppress information and oppress people who write the truth because you are part of the culprits. That is pure hypocrisy. That’s why today, I don’t have respect for any politician or Google because they are all criminals.
There are too many crimes today, but the disturbing part is that the politicians, rich people, and health institutions are involved.
They kill innocent people with biological weapons of AIDS and Ebola, yet you try to force people to believe that primates, bats, poverty, bushmeat, etc., are responsible.
Google now controls what I write by either reducing our blogs' visibility in search engines or blocking the access of our readers on social media to reach what we write. This is a crime, but the management considers it normal.
The punishment for your lies, deception, and crimes is the result of the coronavirus today. Many were hoping Africa would not be spared by the coronavirus, but not this time.
Africa has suffered enough from deliberate disease infections, including Aids, nodding disease, and Ebola; therefore, God says enough is enough.
Those harassing me, trying to bury our blogs, reducing the visibility of our blogs in search engines, and diverting our articles to 404 errors because of the truth must continue to do so. Whatever goes around, comes around. When their time comes, we shall read about their disgrace as it unfolds.
You can be rich, but you will never be happy because you are causing suffering to others that they don’t deserve.
Once you know of the crimes that politicians, the upper class, health institutions, and companies commit, it's really difficult to have respect for them. That's why today, I have lost respect for Google. Website owners can worship the search engine company; I will worship God.
Nobody can oppress me, force me to join a gang of wolves in sheep’s clothing, or stop me from writing about your clandestine crimes against humanity because my glory resides in the truth.
If world leaders are very sincere, then it makes sense to hold the US government accountable for the hostile impact of the coronavirus on humanity today. The whole world is suffering today because of the arrogance and foolish pride of America.
As of now, the coronavirus has killed over two million people (2,931,073) and has infected over one hundred and thirty-five million people (135,399,434) worldwide.
Access to the truth has been denied in everything, including politics, because the US government is neither ready to repent nor to submit to its clandestine crimes.
And since the developed world wants to maintain a good relationship with the US government, governments have followed, aided, supported, and abetted the US government’s bad policies to our injury.
COVID-19, which has ferociously hit the world today, is the consequence of previous medical crimes of biological weapons by the US government.
The fact that the developed world enjoys watching biological weapons decimate Africa for the benefit of their economies—for decades they all followed and defended the US government’s lies and deceptions about clandestine biological programs in the third world.
Under the umbrella of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the US government deliberately triggered the biological weapons into the innocent population, targeting a particular race, Black people.
If one accuses the US government of trying to wipe out the Black race, they say it’s not true, yet there are several pieces of evidence about these clandestine plots against humanity, especially Black people.
Above all, if you ask WHO and the CDC why HIV and AIDS have killed more Black people in America and Africa than any other race, they don’t have a specific answer to this question?
Apart from malaria, which has been the only devastating disease on the continent of Africa, diseases such as HIV, AIDS, Ebola, Burkitt’s lymphoma, Kaposi’s sarcoma, nodding disease, etc., were all man-made.
The World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control have broken the health rules by providing false health information on their websites, and these are often ranked high by search engine companies. It's a shame that people on the path of truth are psychologically tortured daily.
Deceptive scientists call the Nodding Syndrome a strange disease; there is nothing strange associated with that—it is a pure biological weapon. Above all, monkeys, primates, bushmeat, bats, etc., have nothing to do with HIV, AIDS, and Ebola. All are biological weapons.
The lies and deceptions of the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control make this world a very dangerous place to live. How long shall this go on? In fact, the US government's bad policies have brought more untold hardships than good to humanity.
With one voice, we need to shout it loud and clear to the US government that enough is enough; they must put their clandestine policies somewhere to bring sanity, peace, and good health to humanity.
The world doesn’t need any more biological weapons after HIV, AIDS, Ebola, and the coronavirus. The authorities can declare war on writers that live by the truth, but the truth will always be there to expose them.
Trump embraces the sad end of his second-term presidential ambitions as Biden wins the presidential race
Worldwide, many world leaders, Americans, and non-Americans were disappointed after Trump lost his second-term bid to be in office as the president, while others too are jubilating for America witnessing Biden becoming the new president.
However, as an African writer, with a different perception of how each American president, including Obama, committed many crimes against humanity in Africa, I don't care who becomes the president of the United States of America. As a matter of fact, Biden will also not be good for Africa. Time will tell.
Right, the former Belgian Prime Minister, Charles Michel, receives Bill Gates in Brussels.
The crimes of Bill Gates are well tolerated by almost all the advanced countries in Europe and the United States of America because citizens of third-world countries are the victims. The truth can be swept under the carpet, but the hump will reveal it. Like Bill Gates, the Belgian government committed so many crimes both physically and medically in Congo; therefore, why should it surprise anyone if Bill Gates comes to Belgium?
The world has to pay for the lies and deceptions in the fields of politics and medical science today
The establishing of peace, security, and the protection of people depend on politics, while medical science which encompasses treatment is very important for health. Unfortunately, both two subjects have deviated from the path of truth to lies and deceptions.
"The truth is not a commodity sold in the shop but only a few people can afford it." In today's world, the truth doesn't matter any longer in anything, including politics, science, and health matters. Simple truth, they say but is the truth really simple?
The Bible says, "From the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of heaven has been subjected to violence, and violent people have been raiding it." The same violent people are fighting against the truth to establish lies and violence in our societies.
Throughout the period of the Old Testament to the New Testament, all the good people, including Jesus Christ, that chose the path of the truth, suffered dearly for it because the truth is like an arrow that pierces through the flesh of evildoers.
The truth burns so hot like acid, so many are afraid of it. The truth doesn't give an award, it will rather make you a public enemy number one. The truth will let you lose all your good friends you thought they love you and the truth may likely push you to commit suicide.
Once the Dutch microsurgeon and former professor at the University of Maastricht, Johan van Dongen, whose books about Aids and Ebola exposed the US government's biological weapons programs, told me that:
"He and Ab Osterhaus, one of Dutch famous virologists, were very close, yet when he was making comments about his books, he said, "About Aids and Ebola biological weapons, he (Osterhaus) doesn't know what Dongen is talking about."
That is life and that is how your own close friends can stab you at the back if you choose to speak the truth.
Why this article by the way? This is to inspire everyone who has suffered for speaking the truth to continue to suffer for it instead of giving up because there is always an invincible doom awaiting those that have poisoned this world, leading innocent people to their untimely death.
People are no longer interested in the truth because they don't want to lose their jobs, friends, or become subjects of hate. But what they often forget when the catastrophe strikes both the liars and the truthful people suffer at the same time and very often the liars are those that find it too tough to handle.
Politicians have followed their evil desires and policies to kill innocent people in the United States of America and around the globe, with the coronavirus, yet this is what they don't want to hear.
Joe Biden claims that the light is stronger than the dark, yet, for decades, he has fought the truth to coverup the US government's Aids and Ebola biological weapon crimes in Africa. Hypocrite!
“For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.”
Trump holds the Bible, but it's written in the same Bible that says God shouldn't be mocked.
The hopeless, bitter, and distraught Donald Trump, now calls the coronavirus 'China virus,' because the disease has now killed thousands of innocent people in the United States of America than any country in the world.
The US government is actually the kind of government without shame, remorse, conscience, and integrity because they have more American viruses, including HIV-Aids, Ebola, Burkitt's lymphoma, nodding disease, Kaposi's sarcoma, etc than any country in the world.
Nepotism and tribalism pandemics are destroying Ghana than the coronavirus
In recent decades, Africa has firmly established itself as a continent prone to tribalism and nepotism in all fields. These viruses that create strong family ties and embezzlement of national wealth have sharply increased in Ghanaian politics, leading to the suffering of the common people.
