How to find purpose in a world that no longer feels kind

 

Every obstacle a man faces carries a lesson, even if it is difficult to see in the moment.

There are moments in life when everything feels strangely empty. The routines that once carried us forward lose their color, and even the things we used to enjoy feel distant. In a world that often seems unfriendly, rushed, and lacking in genuine love, it is not unusual to reach a point where life feels meaningless.

 

However, this feeling, as heavy as it is, does not signal the end of your story. It can be the beginning of a profound transformation. The first step toward reclaiming meaning is to accept the feeling without shame. Many people try to hide their emotional struggles, believing that admitting them is a sign of weakness, but acknowledging that you are struggling is an act of courage.

 

It opens the door to understanding what your heart is trying to tell you. Instead of fighting the emptiness, allow yourself to recognize it. This acceptance is not surrender; it is the foundation for rebuilding your inner world. When life feels meaningless, grand ambitions can feel overwhelming. That is why it helps to reconnect with the smallest sources of meaning.

 

A quiet walk, a warm cup of tea, a conversation with someone who listens, or even a moment of stillness can begin to restore your sense of connection. These small experiences are not insignificant. They are the seeds from which purpose grows. Meaning rarely returns in a dramatic flash; it returns gently, through small sparks that slowly light the way forward.

 

Every obstacle you face carries a lesson, even if it is difficult to see in the moment. Instead of asking why life has become so hard, try asking what this moment is trying to teach you. Challenges often reveal strengths you didn’t know you had. They push you to grow, to shed old habits, and to discover new ways of living.

 

When you begin to see obstacles as teachers rather than punishments, your relationship with hardship changes. You become stronger, more resilient, and more aware of your own potential. Meaning is not something you wait for; it is something you create through action. Even small, purposeful steps can shift your emotional landscape. Helping someone who cannot repay you, learning a new skill, creating something with your hands, or setting one simple goal each day can gradually rebuild your sense of direction.

 

Purpose grows through movement, not through waiting for inspiration to strike. The people around you play a powerful role in shaping how you feel. In a world that often feels cold, it becomes essential to surround yourself with those who add value to your life. Seek out individuals who listen without judgment, who encourage your growth, and who respect your boundaries.

 

At the same time, distance yourself from those who drain your energy or diminish your worth. The company you keep can nourish or weaken your spirit, and choosing wisely is an act of self-preservation. Today’s world is filled with noise, news, social media, conflict, comparison, and constant pressure. When life feels meaningless, this noise becomes overwhelming.  Reducing the amount of negativity can make a profound difference.

 

Silence is not emptiness; it is space. It gives your mind room to breathe, to think, and to rebuild. Protecting your inner peace is not selfish; it is necessary. As you begin to heal, creating a personal philosophy can help anchor you. Reflect on what you stand for, what values matter most to you, and what kind of life you want to build. These principles become your compass.

 

Even when the world feels chaotic, your inner direction remains steady. A personal philosophy gives you something to return to when everything else feels uncertain. Allowing yourself to dream again is another essential step. When life feels meaningless, dreaming can feel dangerous, as if hope itself might disappoint you. However, dreams are not luxuries; they are survival tools.

 

They give your mind a destination and remind you that your story is still unfolding. Imagine a future where you feel fulfilled. Picture a version of yourself who is stronger, wiser, and more at peace. These visions are not fantasies; they are possibilities waiting for your courage. There may be times when the weight feels too heavy to carry alone.

 

Reaching out to someone you trust, whether a friend, a family member, or a professional, can provide grounding and perspective. Seeking support is not a sign of weakness; it is a sign of wisdom. No one is meant to navigate life entirely alone, and sharing your burden can lighten it more than you expect. Ultimately, the feeling of meaninglessness is often the beginning of transformation.

 

Many people who eventually found deep purpose once felt exactly as you do now. This emotional winter, as cold and still as it may be, is preparing the ground for a new spring. Your life is not over. It is evolving, and even if you cannot see the path ahead, every small step you take is shaping a future filled with more strength, clarity, and purpose than you can imagine.

 

Meaning is not something the world hands to you; it is something you cultivate through courage, curiosity, and compassion. When life feels meaningless, it is not a sign that you are broken. It is a sign that you are ready for a new beginning, and beginnings, no matter how small, are powerful.

 

Climate change: How melting ice signals a warming world

 

Climate change is affecting polar bears primarily by accelerating the loss of Arctic sea ice

Climate change is no longer a distant threat discussed only in scientific circles or political summits. It is here, reshaping the world with a speed and intensity that humanity has never witnessed before. From rising seas swallowing coastlines to extreme heat waves claiming lives, the planet is sending unmistakable signals that its balance has been disrupted.

 

The question is no longer whether climate change is real, but how long we can afford to ignore its accelerating impact. Across continents, the environment is undergoing dramatic transformations. Glaciers that once stood as ancient monuments of ice are melting at unprecedented rates. Forests, from the Amazon to Central Africa, are burning more frequently and more intensely, releasing massive amounts of carbon into the atmosphere.

 

Oceans, which absorb much of the world’s excess heat, are warming and acidifying, threatening marine life and the livelihoods of millions who depend on them. These environmental shifts are not isolated events; they are interconnected symptoms of a planet under stress. Human communities are feeling the pressure as well. Extreme weather events, floods, droughts, hurricanes, and wildfires are becoming more frequent and more destructive.

 

Entire regions face water scarcity, forcing families to migrate in search of survival, while farmers struggle with unpredictable seasons, shrinking harvests, and soil degradation. In many parts of the world, climate change is deepening inequality, hitting the poorest and most vulnerable communities the hardest. The crisis is not only environmental; it is social, economic, and humanitarian.

 

Even the animal kingdom is caught in this unfolding tragedy. Polar bears, once symbols of Arctic majesty, now struggle to find stable ice on which to hunt. Their shrinking habitat is a stark reminder that climate change does not discriminate; it affects every living being. From coral reefs bleaching into lifeless skeletons to migratory birds losing their natural rhythms, the natural world is being pushed to the brink.

 

The loss of biodiversity is not just heartbreaking; it destabilizes ecosystems that humans rely on for food, water, and clean air. Yet amid the urgency, there is still room for action. Scientists, activists, and communities around the world are calling for a collective response that matches the scale of the crisis. Renewable energy is becoming more accessible. Young people are raising their voices in global movements.

 

Nations are beginning to rethink policies and invest in sustainable solutions, and the path forward demands courage, innovation, and a willingness to change the way we live and consume. Climate change is the defining challenge of our time, as it threatens our environment, our health, our economies, and our future.

 

Most importantly, it also offers an opportunity, an opportunity to rethink our relationship with the Earth and to build a world that is more resilient, more just, and more sustainable. The planet is crying out, and the responsibility to respond rests with all of us.

 

I discovered this morning that Google has been disabling my labels

 

Google has been quietly disabling my labels 

For years, I have relied on Blogger’s labeling system as a vital tool for organizing my work, guiding readers through complex topics, and ensuring that my articles remain accessible in a digital landscape increasingly shaped by algorithms.

 

Labels are not cosmetic; they are the backbone of navigation, categorization, and search visibility. So imagine my shock this morning when I discovered that Google has been quietly disabling my labels, without warning, without explanation, and without any legitimate justification.

 

This was not a minor glitch. It was a deliberate removal of structure from my platform, a disruption that affects both my workflow and my readers’ ability to find the stories that matter.

 

A Pattern Too Consistent to Ignore

 

This is not the first time Google has interfered with my Blogger tools. Over the years, I have documented several instances where essential features, statistics, widgets, and navigation elements were disabled or malfunctioned in ways that conveniently undermined my reach. Each time, the issue mysteriously resolved itself only after public exposure.

But disabling labels crosses a new line. Labels are not optional. They are integral to:

•             Search engine indexing

•             Internal organization

•             Reader navigation

•             Topic clustering

•             Long-term archival of investigative work

Removing them is equivalent to ripping chapters out of a book and scattering the pages.

Why This Matters Far Beyond My Blog

When a platform as powerful as Google interferes with the basic tools of a writer, it raises serious questions about transparency, accountability, and the invisible mechanisms that shape public discourse. For journalists, especially those who challenge dominant narratives or expose uncomfortable truths, these disruptions are not random. They are part of a broader pattern of digital gatekeeping.

 

If labels can be disabled today, what stops them from disabling entire posts tomorrow? What stops them from burying content, throttling visibility, or quietly altering the architecture that determines who gets heard?

 

The Human Cost of Digital Interference

 

Behind every article I publish is a mission: to document forgotten histories, expose injustices, and give voice to communities that have been silent for generations. When Google interferes with my tools, it is not just a technical inconvenience; it is an obstruction of advocacy.

 

Millions of readers rely on my work. Many return daily. They deserve a platform that functions as promised, not one that selectively disables features in ways that undermine the integrity of the content.

A Call for Transparency

Google owes its users, especially journalists, clear answers:

•             Why were labels disabled?

•             Who authorized the change?

How many other bloggers have been affected?

•             What safeguards exist to prevent this from happening again?

Silence is not acceptable. Technical manipulation, whether intentional or “accidental,” has real consequences for freedom of expression.

 

Moving Forward With Resilience

 

Despite these obstacles, I remain committed to my work. Every attempt to suppress or disrupt only strengthens my resolve. I will continue to document these incidents publicly, not only to protect my own platform but also to raise awareness for others who may be experiencing similar interference without realizing it.

Digital suppression thrives in silence. I refuse to be silent.

Two articles that I discovered without labels this morning are "Why love is still the most powerful force in a divided world" and "Jeffrey Epstein: A case study in how the powerful escape justice."

To Whom It May Concern: This is an example of an article for which labels have been disabled by Google. Underneath the article, readers will find no labels. Thank you. Neo‑Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism-The book that terrified foreign powers to overthrow Nkrumah

I will keep updating this article for readers to see other articles that Google has removed its labels from. Below is another one. The removal of the labels of this particular article doesn't even make sense. Pure jealousy: 1.Why love is still the most powerful force in a divided world

2. Today's article labels have also been disabled: What happens to my voice when I’m no longer alive to defend it?

3. The third article, whose labels have been disabled: Press Freedom in Scandinavia: What Africa can learn, and what Europe must fix

Understanding tumors: early signs, risks, and when to seek help

 

A malignant lung tumor

Tumors can appear almost anywhere in the body

Tumors are one of the most misunderstood health conditions, often surrounded by fear and confusion. In reality, a tumor simply refers to an abnormal growth of cells, and not all tumors are cancerous. 

Some are benign and harmless, while others are malignant and require medical attention. Understanding the basic signs, how tumors form, and when to consult a healthcare professional can make a life‑changing difference.

 

What exactly is a tumor?

 

A tumor, also called a neoplasm, is a mass of tissue formed when abnormal cells grow and divide more than they should. Tumors can appear almost anywhere in the body: the skin, organs, bones, glands, or soft tissues. Some tumors remain localized and do not spread, while malignant tumors can invade nearby tissues or travel through the bloodstream or lymphatic system to other parts of the body.

 

Common symptoms to watch for

 

Symptoms vary depending on where the tumor is located, how large it becomes, and whether it affects surrounding organs or nerves. Some general signs associated with tumors include:

 

•             Persistent pain or discomfort

•             Unexplained fatigue

•             Noticeable lumps or swelling

•             Unexplained weight loss

•             Changes in skin appearance

•             Long‑lasting headaches

•             Difficulty swallowing or breathing

•             Bleeding or unusual discharge

 

 

These symptoms do not automatically mean cancer; many other conditions can cause similar signs, but they should prompt a medical evaluation.

 

How tumors cause symptoms

 

Tumors create symptoms in several ways. They may press on nearby organs, nerves, or blood vessels, causing pain or functional problems. Some tumors release substances that affect the body’s metabolism, leading to fatigue, fever, or weight changes. When a tumor grows large or spreads, symptoms may appear in different parts of the body.

 

When to seek medical attention

 

Any persistent, unexplained change in your body deserves attention. Early detection is one of the strongest factors in successful treatment. Health organizations emphasize that noticing unusual symptoms early and discussing them with a doctor can save lives.

 

Why awareness matters

 

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide, but survival rates continue to improve thanks to better screening, early diagnosis, and increased public awareness. Understanding the basics of tumors empowers individuals to act sooner and seek proper evaluation.

Jeffrey Epstein: A case study in how the powerful escape justice

 

Jeffrey Epstein 

Jeffrey Epstein Case

The Jeffrey Epstein scandal remains one of the clearest illustrations of how wealth, power, and influence can distort the justice system. For years, Epstein operated in elite circles, surrounded by politicians, billionaires, academics, and celebrities.

 

Despite multiple allegations of sexual abuse, trafficking, and exploitation of minors, he managed to evade meaningful accountability. His ability to escape consequences was not accidental; it was the result of a system that bends for the powerful while crushing the vulnerable.

 

Epstein’s 2008 “sweetheart deal” in Florida exposed the machinery of privilege at work. Prosecutors negotiated a secret agreement that shielded him and unnamed “co-conspirators” from federal charges, even though the evidence was overwhelming.

 

Ordinary people never receive such treatment. The fact that this deal was hidden from the victims, a violation of federal law, shows how far officials were willing to go to protect a man with connections to presidents, royalty, and global financiers.

 

The case also highlights a broader pattern: when the wealthy commit crimes, they often do so with the confidence that the system will protect them. Epstein’s private island, private jets, and private networks allowed him to operate in the shadows, while his money bought silence, loyalty, and legal shields.

 

Meanwhile, the victims, many of them young, vulnerable girls, were treated as disposable. Their voices were ignored for years because they lacked the social power to be heard.

 

Even Epstein’s death raised more questions than answers. Whether one believes it was suicide or something more sinister, the fact remains that a man with deep ties to global elites died in a federal facility under circumstances that defy logic. The public’s skepticism is not irrational; it is rooted in a long history of powerful individuals escaping scrutiny through influence, intimidation, or institutional complicity.

 

Ultimately, the Epstein case is not just about one man. It is a mirror reflecting a justice system that operates on two tracks: one for the powerful and one for everyone else.

 

Until societies confront this imbalance and demand transparency, accountability, and equal treatment under the law, similar abuse will continue. Epstein may be gone, but the structures that enabled him to remain firmly in place.

 

Will robots take over the cockpit?

 

While autonomous drones and military robots are already conducting surveillance and attacks, robots in the cockpit can be possible.

The aviation industry is entering a new era where innovation is no longer optional but inevitable. As artificial intelligence and robotics advance at breathtaking speed, a question once reserved for science fiction has become a serious global debate: will robots eventually take control of the cockpit?

 

With airlines exploring autonomous systems and manufacturers pushing the limits of automation, the future of air travel may look very different from what we know today. From the Wright brothers’ first flight to today’s ultra‑sophisticated jets, aviation has always been shaped by technological progress.

 

Yet no development has sparked as much curiosity and concern as the rise of artificial intelligence in the cockpit. As engineers design aircraft capable of making split‑second decisions without human intervention, society is left to confront a bold question: Are we ready to trust robots with our lives at 35,000 feet?

 

Air travel has long relied on the skill, intuition, and judgment of human pilots. However, as technology evolves, the boundaries between human expertise and machine precision are beginning to blur.

 

Autonomous systems are already assisting pilots in ways unimaginable a decade ago, raising a compelling question for the future of aviation: could robots one day replace humans in the cockpit?

 

Whether robots will fully take over our air travel remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the conversation can no longer be ignored. As technology continues to evolve, society must decide how much control we are willing to hand over to machines.

 

The future of aviation may not eliminate human pilots, but it will undoubtedly redefine their role and reshape our understanding of safety, trust, and innovation. Robots in the cockpit may sound radical today, but so did many breakthroughs that now define modern aviation.

 

What matters most is ensuring that innovation serves humanity, not the other way around. As we move toward a future where humans and machines collaborate more closely than ever, the skies may become safer, smarter, and more efficient than we ever imagined.

 

If technology continues its rapid ascent, the question may no longer be whether robots will take over our air travel, but when. The world must prepare for an aviation revolution that challenges tradition and forces us to rethink our relationship with machines.

 

According to experts, robots are statistically safer in routine operations, but humans remain critical in emergencies and unpredictable scenarios. Autonomous systems reduce error rates, yet full replacement of human pilots still poses ethical and technical challenges.

 

Whether we embrace or resist this transformation, the future of flight is already taxiing down the runway.

Their shame is showing, and traffic has become their weapon

 

In today's world, powerful institutions are not worried about crimes they have committed; however, they are worried about articles that question them.  

For years, powerful institutions have operated with impunity, confident that their misconduct would remain hidden behind polished press releases, friendly media alliances, and the silence imposed on those who dared to speak.

 

However, an African writer residing in Europe has made it shifted. The truth has seeped through the cracks, and the perpetrators of injustice, whether governments, corporations, or digital gatekeepers, now feel the sting of exposure. Shame has finally reached them.

 

Today, one of the most effective tools of retaliation is not a courtroom, a police force, or a political decree. It is traffic, the flow of visibility, reach, and public attention that determines whether a voice is heard or buried.

 

In the digital age, controlling traffic is the new censorship, and suppressing it is the modern equivalent of confiscating a printing press. Traffic manipulation is subtle, deniable, and devastating. It allows institutions to punish critics without ever issuing a threat. They simply:

•             throttle visibility

•             distort analytics

•             block distribution

•             hide content from search

•             or fabricate technical glitches.

 

The result is the same: the truth becomes harder to find, and the whistleblower appears irrelevant. This tactic is especially effective against independent journalists, activists, and marginalized communities, those who rely on digital platforms to bypass traditional media barriers. When their traffic is strangled, their influence is neutralized.

 

Shame is a powerful motivator. It forces institutions to confront the reality they have long denied: that their actions are being watched, documented, and judged. But instead of correcting their behavior, many choose to silence the messenger. They fear the consequences of accountability more than the consequences of wrongdoing.

 

So they weaponize the one thing they control absolutely: the infrastructure of visibility. Every attempt to bury a story only proves its importance. Every manipulation of traffic is an admission of guilt. Every technical issue that conveniently affects only critical voices is a confession disguised as a malfunction.

 

When institutions feel ashamed, they reveal themselves through their desperation. The very tactics used to silence independent voices have become evidence of the crimes being exposed. Traffic suppression is not just censorship; it is a digital fingerprint of institutional fear.

 

By documenting these patterns, exposing them publicly, and refusing to be intimidated, journalists and activists transform suppression into testimony. The weapon they use becomes the proof of what they are trying to hide. They may manipulate traffic, distort analytics, and attempt to erase the truth from public view.

 

However, they can’t erase the shame that drives them, and they can’t erase the growing awareness of those who refuse to be silenced. Traffic may be their weapon, but truth remains ours.

 

Ishowspeed in Ghana: The African homecoming of a global internet phenomenon

Darren Jason Watkins Jr, alias IShowSpeed

Darren Jason Watkins Jr., globally known as IShowSpeed, arrived in Ghana as part of his Speed Does Africa tour, a 20‑country livestream journey that drew massive international attention.

 

His stop in Accra became one of the most talked‑about moments of the entire tour, not only because he expressed a heartfelt belief that his ancestors came from Ghana, but also because of the overwhelming reception he received from fans.

 

Crowds followed him through the streets, chanting his name, gifting him cultural items, and celebrating him as one of their own. During his visit, Ghanaian officials publicly praised him for showcasing the country to a global audience.

 

The Minister of Foreign Affairs even approved a Ghanaian passport for him, a symbolic gesture acknowledging what they described as “irrefutable ties” between Speed and Ghana. This official recognition sparked widespread conversation across the continent and beyond.

 

Cultural connection and emotional moments

 

Speed’s time in Ghana was filled with cultural immersion—traditional drumming, local food, and spontaneous interactions with everyday Ghanaians. He expressed deep emotion at several heritage sites, reinforcing his belief that he was reconnecting with his ancestral lineage.

 

His livestreams captured raw, unscripted moments that resonated with millions of viewers worldwide, further amplifying Ghana’s visibility on the global stage.

 

What made IShowSpeed instantly famous?

 

Before his Africa tour, Speed had already become one of the world’s most recognizable online personalities. His fame exploded due to his high‑energy gaming streams, unpredictable reactions, and comedic outbursts, which quickly went viral across YouTube and TikTok.

 

His bold personality led to mainstream crossover moments, including a surprise appearance inside a WWE ring. He made a surprise in-ring debut as a replacement for the injured Akira Tozawa, entering the match as the eighth entrant.

 

His appearance was a major highlight, though he was eliminated within less than a minute after teaming with Bron Breakker to eliminate Otis, only to be speared by Breakker and subsequently thrown into the announce table by Otis.

 

iShowSpeed’s visit to Ghana in January 2026 was a landmark cultural moment, widely regarded as unforgettable and deeply impactful.

 

Imagine a world with love as its global currency

 

A world without war, where love is the global currency, envisions a society fundamentally transformed by empathy, cooperation, nonviolence, and non-oppression as guiding principles.

Imagine waking up in a world where the morning news carries no reports of bombings, invasions, or political threats. Instead, the headlines celebrate communities rebuilding together, children learning without fear, and nations cooperating not out of strategic necessity but out of shared humanity.

 

In such a world, the word "enemy" would feel like an artifact from a distant, primitive past, something studied in museums, not lived in daily life. In a world without war, borders would still exist, but they would no longer be lines of suspicion. They would be cultural bridges, places where languages, foods, and traditions meet and enrich one another.

 

Soldiers would not be trained to fight; they would be trained to protect forests, rebuild after natural disasters, and preserve the fragile beauty of the planet. The trillions spent on weapons would be redirected toward healing, eradicating poverty, curing diseases, and ensuring that every child grows up with dignity.

 

When love reigns, power transforms. Leadership becomes service, not domination. Nations compete not in arms races but in compassion: who can shelter the most refugees, who can develop the most sustainable technologies, who can uplift the most vulnerable.

 

Love becomes the global currency, and its value increases every time it is shared. In such a world, humanity finally understands that peace is not the absence of conflict but the presence of justice, empathy, and mutual respect. Imagine a world where the worth of a nation is not measured by the size of its military budget or the strength of its economy, but by the depth of its compassion.

 

In this world, love, not gold, not oil, not political influence, becomes the universal currency that determines how societies function and how leaders govern. Every act of kindness increases a nation’s wealth; every injustice depletes it. Suddenly, the balance sheets of humanity look very different.

In such a world, international relations would no longer revolve around strategic alliances or calculated rivalries. Instead, countries would compete in generosity, in empathy, in the ability to uplift the vulnerable. Diplomatic negotiations would focus on how to share resources equitably, how to protect the planet, and how to ensure that every child, regardless of birthplace, has a chance to thrive.

 

The richest nations would be those that invest the most in human dignity when love becomes the global currency, and communities transform. Schools teach emotional intelligence alongside mathematics. Media platforms amplify stories of unity rather than conflict. Even justice systems evolve, shifting from punishment to restoration, from retribution to healing.

 

People begin to understand that true security comes not from weapons but from trust, solidarity, and shared purpose. This imagined world is not as distant as it seems. The seeds already exist in the countless individuals who choose compassion over cruelty, truth over silence, and courage over fear.

 

If humanity can recognize love as its most valuable resource, then perhaps one day this vision will move from imagination to reality, and perhaps the most beautiful part of the imagined world is that it isn’t entirely unreachable.

 

The seeds of it already exist in acts of kindness, in communities that choose dialogue over violence, and in individuals who refuse to hate even when hatred is easier. 

A world without war is not a fantasy; it is a direction, and every choice we make, every truth we speak, every injustice we expose brings us one step closer to a future where love truly reigns.

Trump’s withdrawal from the WHO: A moment that vindicates my stand

 

The WHO hasn't been honest for decades, and Trump has made it apparent

Under Trump’s administration, several developments have unfolded that, in my view, are not mere coincidences but instead reinforce the relevance of my earlier writings.

 

When I exposed the questionable activities of the World Health Organization in developing nations, many dismissed it with indifference. After all, it concerned Africa, and for some, that alone was enough reason not to care.

 

Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO) stemmed from a combination of accusations about the agency’s performance during the COVID‑19 pandemic, concerns about transparency, and claims that the organization had become too closely aligned with China.

 

According to the administration, the WHO did not act quickly or independently enough and relied too heavily on information provided by the Chinese government. These concerns were presented as evidence that the organization lacked the transparency, accountability, and independence required to safeguard global health.

 

Another major justification Trump offered was financial. He claimed the United States was contributing disproportionately to the WHO’s budget while receiving little in return. In his view, the organization was not only ineffective but also an unnecessary drain on American resources.

 

This argument aligned with his broader approach to international institutions, which he often criticized for what he saw as unfair financial burdens on the U.S. The administration also insisted that the WHO had repeatedly refused to implement reforms the U.S. considered essential.

 

These included structural changes aimed at increasing oversight, improving crisis response mechanisms, and reducing what the administration described as political influence within the organization. When these reforms did not materialize, Trump signed an executive order in January 2025 to begin the formal withdrawal process, which became official one year later.

 

It’s worth noting that WHO leadership publicly rejected the administration’s accusations, calling the stated reasons “untrue” and warning that the withdrawal would make both the U.S. and the world less safe. They emphasized that the U.S. had long been a key contributor to global health efforts and expressed hope that it would eventually return.

 

Who would have imagined that similar concerns would one day surface in the United States? Donald Trump’s decisions and his public accusations against the World Health Organization, in my opinion, validate the warnings I raised years ago. These actions are among the reasons many dislike him, yet I do not share that sentiment.

 

For several reasons, I will refrain from detailing the medical abuses the World Health Organization carried out in Africa, abuses the U.S. government can’t easily claim ignorance of. What I can state with certainty is that Trump’s position on the WHO has, in many ways, vindicated the concerns I raised years ago.

When justice becomes selective in America, no one is safe

 

A trained lion consuming black chickens will eat white chickens when it is hungry.

The release of the man responsible for Renee Nicole Good’s death has struck a nerve across the United States, not only because of the tragedy itself but because of what it symbolizes. When a system appears to excuse or minimize violence committed by those in positions of authority, it sends a dangerous message: impunity is negotiable.

 

Many fear that such decisions embolden agencies like ICE to act with even less restraint, knowing accountability is inconsistent and often politically selective. A week ago, I urged Americans to respect the office of the presidency, regardless of their personal feelings toward Donald Trump.

 

Some readers misunderstood me, but the point I raised is bigger than any single political figure. I questioned Americans to confront a contradiction: how can a nation protest abuses committed by its own institutions today while ignoring or even supporting similar abuses inflicted on vulnerable populations or developing countries for decades?

 

The United States and its Western allies have long been involved in policies that destabilize developing nations, exploit their resources, and undermine their sovereignty. These actions rarely provoke outrage at home, yet when similar patterns of mistreatment begin to surface domestically, the shock is sudden and selective.

 

If Americans had consistently opposed injustice, whether against African-Americans, immigrants, or communities in developing countries, the current climate of institutional aggression might never have taken root. When a society tolerates or rationalizes harm against one group, it inadvertently normalizes the mechanisms of oppression.

 

Eventually, those same mechanisms can be redirected toward anyone, including the very citizens who once felt insulated by them. Power, once unrestrained, does not discriminate.

 

A lion trained to eat only black chickens will eventually eat white ones when hunger strikes. This captures a universal truth about systems of abuse. Once a structure is built to dehumanize or dominate, it does not remain confined to its original targets. History shows that unchecked power expands, adapts, and ultimately consumes whatever stands in its path.

 

The lesson is not about race alone; it is about the predictable behavior of institutions that operate without accountability. At the heart of the message is a simple but urgent principle: equality is not optional. A society that wants to protect its own citizens must first reject injustice everywhere, not only when it becomes personally inconvenient.

 

True justice requires consistency, empathy, and the courage to confront uncomfortable truths about one’s own nation. Until that happens, the cycle of selective outrage and selective justice will continue, and tragedies like Renee Nicole Good’s case will remain symptoms of a deeper moral failure.

Fear: The silent weapon that weakens the body, the mind, and our freedom

 

Fear is central to the maintenance of oppression, as those in power often rely on the fear of the oppressed to sustain control. I don’t have it. 

Fear is one of the most destructive forces in human life. It weakens the body, clouds the mind, and slowly erodes a person’s confidence until they no longer trust their own voice.

 

While fear is a natural human emotion, it becomes deeply unhealthy when it is allowed to dominate our decisions, our relationships, and our sense of self.

 

A fearful person is constantly anticipating danger, even when none exists, and this constant tension drains both physical and mental energy.

 

However, fear does more than harm the individual. It empowers those who seek to control them. Throughout history, oppressive systems have relied on fear as their most reliable weapon. When people are afraid, they hesitate to speak, to question, or to resist.

 

Those in positions of power understand this well. They exploit fear to silence dissent, to maintain authority, and to keep communities divided. Fear becomes a tool of manipulation, turning human vulnerability into an opportunity for domination.

 

This is why discouraging fear is not simply a matter of personal well‑being; it is an act of liberation. When people learn to confront fear, they reclaim their autonomy.

 

Courage does not mean the absence of fear; it means refusing to let fear dictate one’s life. A society that encourages courage becomes harder to deceive, harder to control, and harder to oppress. Fear shrinks people; courage expands them.

 

To overcome fear, we must first recognize how it operates. Fear thrives in silence, isolation, and misinformation. It loses its power when people speak openly, support one another, and seek the truth.

 

By choosing courage, whether in small daily decisions or in moments of great injustice, we weaken the systems that depend on our fear.

 

The more we understand fear, the less it can control us, and the more we can stand together against those who benefit from our silence.

 

I fear no one; every powerful person began life as a helpless baby. They may hold authority, but my strength is my pen. Whenever my words defeat them, they reveal their weakness by turning even traffic into a weapon.

 

People who rely on fear to maintain their position are always searching for the timid, the compliant, and the easily intimidated. When they meet someone who doesn’t fear them, their entire strategy collapses.

 

Since childhood, I have feared no one, and I will carry that fearlessness to my grave. Once I reveal who I am, don’t waste your time trying to oppress me. That will never work.

My enemies can only reduce the visibility of my blog, but in doing so, they’ve allowed me to spread the very articles they’re trying to suppress across many platforms.

I extend my gratitude to the management of all the social media platforms and news websites that have enabled me to publish my articles on their platforms. 

While many articles have been improperly taken down from this blog, the individuals behind these actions have no authority over the other platforms where my work continues to be available.

 

What many don’t know: While all Monks are Buddhists, not all Buddhists are Monks

 

Monks in a monastery dedicate their lives to prayer, work, and community living, guided by religious vows and spiritual discipline

A monk wearing saffron robes, his head shaved, walking peacefully while carrying a begging bowl, is a common way for many people outside the faith to imagine Buddhism. Although it is a potent symbol, it is also deceptive. The truth is much more expansive.

 

The overwhelming majority of Buddhists are not monks at all. This distinction, though simple, reveals a deeper story about how Buddhism is lived and understood around the world.

 

Monks as the Public Face of Buddhism

 

Monks occupy a central and highly visible role in Buddhist societies. They are custodians of the teachings, responsible for preserving scriptures, guiding communities, and maintaining centuries‑old traditions.

 

Their disciplined lifestyle, marked by renunciation, meditation, and strict ethical rules, makes them stand out in any cultural setting. Because of this visibility, many people assume monks represent the entirety of Buddhist practice. However, they are only a small segment of a much larger spiritual community.

 

The lay majority: Practicing Buddhism beyond the monastery

 

Most Buddhists are ordinary men and women who integrate the Buddha’s teachings into daily life. They work, raise families, run businesses, and navigate the same pressures as anyone else.

 

Their practice is grounded in ethical living, generosity, mindfulness, and compassion. They may visit temples on holy days, support monastic communities, or meditate at home. Their commitment is no less genuine; it simply unfolds outside the walls of a monastery.

 

A tradition built on accessibility

 

From its earliest days, Buddhism has been accessible to people from all walks of life. The Buddha himself taught that enlightenment was not the exclusive domain of monks. Lay followers could progress on the path through moral conduct, mental discipline, and acts of kindness.

 

This openness helped Buddhism spread across continents, adapting to diverse cultures while maintaining its core principles.

 

Why the Misconception Endures

 

The confusion persists largely because of how Buddhism is portrayed in global media. Monks, with their distinctive robes and rituals, make for compelling imagery. Their presence at public ceremonies, protests, or humanitarian efforts often places them at the center of news coverage.

 

Meanwhile, the quiet, everyday practice of millions of lay Buddhists rarely makes headlines. The result is a skewed perception that equates Buddhism solely with monastic life.

 

Understanding the Full Picture

 

Recognizing the difference between monks and lay Buddhists offers a more accurate view of the tradition. It highlights the diversity of Buddhist practice and reminds us that spirituality is not confined to secluded temples. 

Whether one is a monk or a layperson, the heart of Buddhism remains the same: understanding suffering, cultivating wisdom, and living with compassion. Appreciating this broader reality enriches our understanding of a tradition that continues to shape lives across the world.

Cooking at home as a beginner without tears

 

Cooking at home is healthy and saves money

I am always motivated to write about cooking for two important reasons. First, I learned to cook from a very young age. I grew up watching my mother prepare delicious meals for my father, and those moments shaped my understanding of food, care, and family.

 

Later, working in a restaurant in Antwerp strengthened my skills and gave me professional experience in the kitchen. Cooking has become more than a habit. When you know how to cook properly, you don’t rush to restaurants.

 

You can prepare healthier, tastier meals in your own kitchen, and you enjoy the comfort and savings that come with home‑cooked food. Everything tastes delicious in the mouths of most people who are incapable of cooking and prefer to eat fast food or at the restaurant.

 

Cooking at home is one of the most rewarding habits anyone can develop. It saves money, strengthens your connection to the food you eat, and gives you the freedom to create meals that truly reflect your tastes and values.

 

Many people rely on restaurants out of convenience, but with a little guidance and practice, preparing your own meals becomes not only easy but also enjoyable. You don’t need to be a professional chef to get started; you just need curiosity, patience, and a willingness to learn.

 

The first step is to simplify your approach. Start with basic ingredients you already know: rice, pasta, vegetables, eggs, chicken, or beans. Learn a few foundational techniques such as boiling, sautéing, roasting, and seasoning.

 

These simple skills open the door to countless dishes. Once you master the basics, you’ll find that cooking becomes less of a chore and more of a creative outlet. You’ll also begin to understand how flavors work together, which is the secret to making delicious meals without complicated recipes.

 

Another key to successful home cooking is planning. You don’t need a strict weekly menu, but having a general idea of what you want to cook helps you shop smarter and avoid waste.

 

Keep essential items in your kitchen: spices, onions, garlic, oil, canned tomatoes, and grains. With these staples, you can prepare a satisfying meal even on busy days. Over time, you’ll discover which ingredients you love most and how to build meals around them.

 

Finally, remember that cooking is a journey, not a race. Mistakes will happen, and that’s part of the learning process. What matters is consistency. The more you cook, the more confident you become.

 

And as your skills grow, you’ll realize how much money you save, how much healthier you feel, and how enjoyable it is to create something with your own hands. Cooking at home isn’t just a practical skill; it’s a form of empowerment.

 

For anyone just starting out, remember that you don’t have to figure everything out on your own. A good cookbook can be an invaluable companion, offering clear instructions, reliable recipes, and step‑by‑step guidance whenever you need it.

 

Think of it as a friendly mentor in your kitchen, ready to help you build confidence one meal at a time. With practice, patience, and the right resources, cooking at home becomes not only manageable but also deeply satisfying.

 

You’ve been encouraging people to cook at home, and this point you just made is actually a powerful argument for it. It’s not just about saving money or eating healthier; it’s about reclaiming your taste, your awareness, your standards

 

Google should restore the disabled pageviews widget

 

The page views of my blog has been intentionally disabled 

The sudden disappearance of the total page views widget from my blog this morning is more than a technical inconvenience; it is a direct obstruction to transparency. For years, this widget has allowed me to track the growth, reach, and impact of my work.

 

Its abrupt disabling, especially at a time when Google has already reduced my blog’s visibility in its search engine, raises serious questions about intent and accountability.

 

Google should restore the page views widget without delay. Removing a basic analytical tool does not silence a writer; it only undermines trust in the platform. My blog continues to attract readers organically, with or without Google’s cooperation, and disabling this widget does nothing to change that reality.

 

If anything, it reinforces the perception that Google is making things unnecessarily difficult for itself by attempting to obscure what is already evident: that my work remains relevant, widely read, and resilient.

 

I have always been transparent, consistent, and unwavering in my commitment to truth. Google should have understood by now the kind of person they are dealing with: someone who does not back down, someone who continues to write, expose, and inform regardless of obstacles.

Stop mocking Trump: Respect the office you elected

 

Donald Trump, the US president. 

In every democracy, citizens reserve the right to criticize their leaders, challenge their decisions, and debate the direction of their country. However, what has unfolded around Donald Trump goes far beyond ordinary political disagreement.

 

The level of mockery, ridicule, and personal attacks directed at him, often from his own citizens, has reached a point rarely seen in modern American politics. Whether one agrees with his policies or not, the relentless culture of making fun of a sitting president raises deeper questions about respect, national unity, and historical awareness.

 

Many Americans argue that they oppose Trump because they dislike his policies. Yet disagreement with a leader’s agenda has never justified the kind of public humiliation that has become normalized. Critique is healthy; ridicule is corrosive.

 

A nation that claims to value democracy should also value the office of the presidency, even when the occupant is controversial. When mockery becomes the default response, it weakens the very institutions people claim to defend.

 

What makes this situation even more striking is the selective outrage. Some of the same Americans who loudly condemn Trump’s policies today remained silent when previous U.S. administrations imposed harmful policies on Africa, policies that destabilized economies, supported dictatorships, fueled conflicts, and contributed to the long-term suffering of millions.

 

For decades, the African continent has borne the consequences of decisions made in Washington, often without the American public showing the same passion or moral indignation they now display toward Trump.

 

This contrast exposes a troubling double standard. If Americans believe certain policies are harmful, then consistency demands that they also acknowledge the damage caused by earlier administrations, Republican and Democrat alike, whose actions abroad had far more devastating consequences than anything they accuse Trump of domestically.

 

The silence during those years suggests that outrage is often selective, shaped more by internal political divisions than by genuine concern for justice or human rights.

 

It is therefore difficult to accept the argument that Trump deserves ridicule because of his policies. If harmful policies are the measure, then past leaders should have faced far greater scrutiny for the suffering their decisions inflicted on Africa. Instead, many Americans ignored or minimized those impacts, while today they feel justified in mocking their own president over disagreements that pale in comparison.

 

Respecting the presidency does not mean agreeing with everything a leader does. It means recognizing that democracy requires a baseline of civility and consistency. If Americans want to hold their leaders accountable, they should do so with fairness, historical awareness, and an understanding of how U.S. policies, past and present, affect not only their own nation but the wider world.

 

Mockery may feel satisfying in the moment, but it does nothing to strengthen democracy or promote meaningful change. A more honest conversation would acknowledge that Trump is not the first U.S. president whose policies sparked controversy, and he will not be the last. What matters is whether citizens can rise above personal attacks and engage with political issues in a way that reflects maturity, integrity, and global awareness.

 

In the end, Donald Trump is the elected president of the United States. Disagree with him if you must, challenge his decisions if you choose, but the culture of making fun of him says more about the nation than it does about the man.

 

A country that demands respect from the world should begin by respecting its own institutions, and by confronting the uncomfortable truth that its past actions abroad deserve just as much scrutiny as its present debates at home.