.Donald Trump declared war against fake news, but not on fake information about HIV/AIDS and Ebola
.
Donald Trump's political campaign slogan was 'America first', but actually, while in office, he wasted so much of his time exchanging words with the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un; working on the assassination of Iran's top general, Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani; and fighting against the 'Fake News', doing little to prevent the COVID-19 disaster in the United States of America.
However,
Trump's fight against fake news has a limit. He never made any attempt to
fight the fake news or false information about HIV/AIDS and Ebola on thousands of health
websites across the globe, including those of the Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organization, BBC,
and CNN, despite calling the latter fake news.
With the BBC, it's worth asking if some media employ certain health writers to produce false health articles, either to suppress information or to protect organisations such as the World Health Organisation or the Centers for Disease Control, for their daily bread.
There are thousands of false articles about Aids and Ebola circulating on the internet. Trump says he is fighting against 'fake news', but thousands of false medical articles about the two diseases and those of the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control on their websites aren't a matter of concern to him.
So why wouldn't Trump like to ask the CDC and WHO the reason they have provided
misleading and false information on AIDS and Ebola to the general public if he is really fighting against fake news or false information? Smartness is a form of stupidity indeed, the reason politicians are fighting tirelessly against crime without any significant results.
It's shocking when one reads some of these false articles about AIDS and Ebola
in respectable newspapers such as 'TheIndependent.Co.UK/news'. On Friday,
September 30, 2016, in the Independent newspaper, there was an article about Ebola
entitled 'Ebola: The secret hideout of the virus', written
by Leigh Cowart.
According to Cowart, "Searches so far have focused on forested parts of Africa, the home of several possible reservoirs." Classically, bats have been considered the most likely culprits, given that they overlap with humans geographically and can carry Ebola infection without symptoms.
Based on research that has tested a wide variety of small mammals, bats,
primates, insects, and amphibians, several species of fruit bat have emerged as
possible candidates.
A 2005 study published in Nature and helmed by Eric Leroy tested more than 1,000 small vertebrates in central Africa and found evidence of symptomless Ebola
infection in three species of fruit bat, suggesting that these animals – which
are sometimes hunted for bushmeat – might be Ebola’s reservoir.
An editor’s summary ran alongside the paper, titled simply: ‘Ebola virus: don’t
eat the bats. ' But not everyone is convinced that fruit bats are to
blame.
Notes from the writer (Joel Savage)
Leigh Cowart, or the editor, knew perfectly well that the article he published didn't make sense; the reason they added it was "But not everyone is convinced that fruit bats are to blame."
Thousands of years before the vaccine for malaria was discovered by the white man, Africans lived with monkeys and bats, and they ate them, but there weren't any Aids or Ebola.
Before and after colonialism, Africans lived with bats, monkeys, and all sorts of creatures, so why have AIDS and Ebola not killed all of them till now? Since Ebola is a bioweapon created in the laboratories of the US government, many writers, such as Leigh Cowart, find it hard to write the truth.
Indeed, the world makes sense. Anyone is convinced of that unstoppable. AIDS is to blame, because
blaming the Ebola epidemic on bats or AIDS on monkeys is a medical tautology or a crime. If you were a researcher or qualified health writer, you could have
easily identified the origin of Ebola, which was the successor of the bioweapon triggered by the United States government.
If health writers had come out with the true origin of HIV/Aids, it wouldn't
have spread so fast. The fact that certain writers gave false information and
that the WHO and CDC lied to the world means the disease is now unstoppable. AIDS is now on the path
of destruction, killing thousands of people globally, but world leaders are quiet
because of a guilty conscience.
Actually, 'the world' means the initial plan, the unstoppable. AIDS was created anyway: to depopulate Africa. But the mistake they made allowed the global spread, and that mistake was never repeated when Ebola was triggered in Africa.
African leaders are powerless and have no voice to speak against biological weapons by the US government. Advanced countries, including America, actually support the corrupt governments in Africa by giving them money to support the fight against HIV/AIDS and Ebola in Africa, then later turn around to call African leaders corrupt.
At the moment, it's not a hidden secret any longer in Africa that Aids and Ebola are
medical crimes. Even the illiterates living in the remotest part of Africa are
now fully aware that Western Europe and the American government created
something dangerous to kill them.
This is one of the reasons health officials sent to a Guinean village to educate the people about Ebola safety were killed and their bodies dumped in septic tanks. Therefore, all the false HIV-AIDS and Ebola information provided by the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control is irrelevant to both educated and illiterate Africans.
Both the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control have abused their trust, and many can't really predict how long it will take the WHO to regain its lost confidence. Above all, how long will that false information about HIV/AIDS and Ebola be on their websites? They can keep it, but Africans will never trust them again.