Does Bing falsely accuse blog and website owners that their sites are under spam?
It seems Bing, the web search engine owned and operated by Microsoft, is on an unstoppable spree, declaring websites and blogs submitted to the search engine's webmaster spam.
All over the internet are thousands of questions associated with the questioning of Bing, as desperate blog and website owners try to find out the reason for why, for weeks, months, and sometimes a year, Bing has failed to index the contents of their websites.
And when they contact Bing, the only excuse Bing tells the site owners is, "Thank you for writing to Bing Webmaster Support. I reviewed your site, but unfortunately when I was investigating, I saw that your site is under the spam list, which can be a reason why we are not indexing it."
This actually doesn't make sense, especially if your blog or website is in a good position in Google's search engine. That means everything is okay, with no breaking of any rule or being penalized, yet still, 'Bing' will say that your blog or website is under spam.
Under the heading 'Bing "Spam" Criteria & De-indexing Question,' some experiencing the same problem wrote:
I'm a webmaster working on client websites that rely on Bing
SEO.
I got a frustrating issue with Bing recently that
de-indexed my client websites.
Checked site:websiteurl.com and got "Some
results have been removed." I created a support ticket regarding one of the sites; they
said the website is under the Bing spam list.
So my questions are:
- How does the Bing "spam" criteria work? I
thought that the website was not spam.
- This also seems weird and frustrating; it happens randomly. This is even happening to a brand-new website, just a few days after I "submit
URL" from the webmaster tool, asking Bing to crawl the website.
Any help is much appreciated.
Imagine the owner of a new website received a response that his website is under spam. Why this article? My blog, on which this article is published, has a good position in Google, Yandex, and even the Czech search engine.
Nobody can tell the logic behind these unfair tactics adopted
by Bing, but on my part, I am relating certain publishing experiences to this
issue. Because I have been writing uncensored articles about Bill Gates'
vaccine crimes in third-world countries and his desire to depopulate the world,
together with the World Health Organization, I was banned from many social websites
that want to suppress information.
Bill Gates is known as the co-founder of Microsoft Corporation, and the Bing search engine belongs to Microsoft; therefore, if I am right, that's the reason my blog, which has many articles about Bill Gates, is now labeled spam. If that's the case, what about other blogs or website owners experiencing similar problems?
Recently, I stumbled upon one of my articles about Bill Gates in the Bing search engine. When I tried to click, a warning notice popped up; it reads: "This site might be dangerous. We suggest that you choose another site. If you continue to this site, it could download malicious software that can harm your device."
Yet, when I copied the URL of the article and used Google and other search engines, I didn't encounter such warnings. I don't know how to describe such an act, whether it is a crime, corruption, or something else, but what I can say is Bing has already tainted its hard-built reputation for being unfair or discriminatory.
The seriousness of the problem after Bing labels your blog or website as spam can remain infinite. You will also not appear in the Yahoo search engine because the two search engine companies have joined as one company.
Bing must emulate or learn something significant from Google because in this world, no matter how lies reign supreme, it takes only a matter of time to be buried by the truth.

No comments:
Post a Comment