How reliable are AI-generated answers?

 

AI-generated answers can be misleading

Everyone is keeping an eye on the developments in artificial intelligence as modern technology has enabled computers to mimic human intelligence. These systems are designed to perform tasks that typically require human cognitive abilities, including learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, and language comprehension.

 

There are two primary types of artificial intelligence: narrow AI, which is focused on a single task and includes voice assistants and recommendation systems, and general AI, which is a hypothetical AI that, like a human, is able to comprehend, learn, and apply intelligence across a wide range of tasks.

 

That being said, with thousands of individuals relying on Artificial Intelligence globally, how trustworthy are the responses that AI provides? When I asked AI to tell me something about my blog, "Juskosave," I wasn't happy with the response; therefore, I felt compelled to create this article.

 

Even though my site's content has been suppressed, its daily readership record decreased, and it is no longer receiving over 10,000 daily reads, and more significantly, its visibility has been completely reduced, some individuals continue to visit my blog regularly to read my articles.

 

Therefore, I wasn't prepared for this kind of response when I asked the AI to tell me something about my blog. AI claims that the blog "Juskosave" focuses on saving advice and personal finance. Furthermore, it offers helpful guidance on budgeting, saving money, and making wise financial decisions, and seeks to assist readers in improving their financial management.

 

I can't recall when I first began giving financial and saving advice to others, much less posting it on my blog. The AI clarified that the "Blog Juskosave" discusses subjects including financial planning, investment methods, and budgeting for life.

 

Regarding user engagement, the AI stated that the blog Juskosave's target audience is people who want to increase their financial literacy and reach their savings objectives, and finally, the blog frequently promotes reader interaction through comments and social media, creating a community of like-minded people. The latter is the only one that I found accurate.

This experience has led me to conclude that the responses we receive from artificial intelligence might not be precise. I can't speak for others, but this is my opinion.

Will robots lead to a future crisis in unemployment?

 

Robots in agriculture: Photo credit-freepik.com

 

Humanity cannot undervalue how quickly modern technology is changing many facets of daily life, the economy, and society. The internet has made it easier for people to communicate and plan their everyday activities. One thing people should keep in mind, though, is that artificial intelligence-controlled robots are not just science fiction anymore.

 

Robots have already replaced humans in several industries, including packaging and sorting in warehouses, coffee making, surgery, street patrol, and customer service. Scientists predict that the integration of robots into society will become commonplace and inevitable within the next ten years. Would this lead to a global unemployment crisis? That is the crucial question.

 

In the upcoming years, robots will continue to play a part in a variety of industries. Humanoid robots are employed in classrooms to instruct pupils, demonstrating the widespread usage of robotic technology in many areas, including healthcare, agriculture, the food industry, manufacturing, mining, and education. Robots are increasingly being used in the car manufacturing industry and defense activities by the military.

 

Even though a portion of the workforce will be replaced by artificial intelligence robots, experts predict that this will not result in the complete elimination of jobs but rather in a significant shift in the labor market. The global unemployment rate may not be rising significantly; rather, a large redistribution of jobs will be concealed by this macro-metric.

 

Society's inability to adapt to the rapid pace of change poses a greater threat than the robots themselves. The difficulty can be transformed into an opportunity for nations that make investments in education for the future, establish adaptable social support networks, and figure out how to properly share the advantages of automation. 

They will be able to use the human potential that has been liberated from routine to solve challenging issues, be creative, and enhance people's quality of life.

 

Humans and robots will collaborate in the future rather than fight each other. However, achieving this future calls for a level of preparation, human capital investment, and social cohesion never seen before. The only way to make the integration of robots a benefit rather than a curse is to actively manage the transition.