HOW CORRUPT IS THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT IN THE HAGUE?

The International Criminal Court, for several years now, has actually failed to bring advanced countries' leaders to face the law for their crimes against humanity in the third world, especially in Africa.

Established based on the Rome Statute and adopted in 1998, the International Criminal Court (ICC, in The Hague, the Netherlands) initially began its work on July 1, 2002. 

As the first permanent international criminal court, some of the ICC's tasks are to prosecute those responsible for genocide, war crimes against humanity, and crimes committed through military aggression.

 

For some time, the International Criminal Court has been under pressure and criticism for centering its effective activities and targeting war crimes in only African countries, thus putting only African leaders behind bars, while they pretend not to be aware of the political and medical crimes foreign countries, including Holland, the United States of America, Britain, Belgium, etc., have committed in Africa.

Certain crimes occurred during and after colonialism in Africa that the International Criminal Court should have addressed when it was established. After slavery, Africa suffered apartheid in South Africa, while King Leopold's reign of terror decimated the Congolese in the Belgian colony of Congo.


Following the history of Africa under colonialism until the time independence swept through the continent, apart from physical crimes, medical research also proved enough that Europe and America deliberately inflicted man-made diseases in Africa through vaccination or via the eradication of other diseases, such as polio.


In reality, Europe and America shouldn't have escaped justice. It should have been the priority for African leaders to bring all those responsible for crimes in Africa to face justice on African soil. This was never done; instead, today there is the International Criminal Court in The Hague, which puts African leaders who commit crimes against humanity behind bars. 


American and European leaders have swept all the crimes they committed in Africa under the carpet and brought in African leaders they think have committed a crime against mankind to The Hague to be prosecuted. 

The ineffective and partial service, promoted by the ICC, sparked unrest in Africa, leading to protests and the call of some African countries to quit the ICC.

 

On our rare health blog, ‘Secrets of HIV-AIDS and Ebola Facts Journal,’ we have written numerous articles about the incompetence of the International Criminal Court and even suggested that it’s time for them to close down their offices.

 

It seems the International Criminal Court wants to impress the world and rebut the accusation of being corrupt, partial, and biased. 

In 2017, the department’s prosecutor, Fatu Bensuda, asked the judges to issue permission to investigate war crimes that we, the CIA, and the Taliban in Afghanistan could have committed. 

 

The International Criminal Court supported requests and decisions that have caused outrage in the United States. Just as we know that elites don’t go to jail, the aggressive and corrupt America, which never likes to be investigated, protested and accused the International Criminal Court of corruption and biased investigators.

 

Does the International Criminal Court deserve to be branded biased and corrupt? Yes, they deserve it. Why, for so long, have they ignored the crimes against humanity in Africa but now want attention by investigating the US government?

 

The same thing has happened to the World Health Organization. Decades after assisting the US government to inflict biological weapons and sending contaminated vaccines to Africa, leading to the spread of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, Burkitt’s lymphoma, Kaposi’s sarcoma, nodding disease, and Ebola, the US government turned around to accuse the World Health Organization of corruption.

 

This is a lesson to all organizations aiding and supporting the crimes of the so-called super countries. It’s also a lesson to the media and search engine companies, aiding, supporting, and abetting the crimes of governments, rich people, and politicians, while they suppress information about those crimes.

The International Criminal Court needs to be very careful if it wants to be respected and recognized as an efficient juridical organization. 

They must not feel sorry for the advanced countries' leaders if they don't feel sorry for African leaders. No matter how hard the situation may seem, they must let them face the law for every crime against humanity.

The International Criminal Court must stop protecting these mad dogs because, in the end, they will turn around to bite them, as we are witnessing today.

POLYGAMY AND EUROPE'S ECONOMY DEMAND ONE MAN, ONE WIFE

One man, three wives, a common thing to see in Islamic polygamy

Europe is gradually becoming a polygamous continent, due to migrations and settlements by people coming from countries with their own contrasting laws and cultures.

They follow the doctrine of the Koran and enter into polygamous marriages, before migration and within Europe, without realizing that it is an offense since polygamous marriages do not conform to the European pattern.

Polygamy is very common in Muslim countries, where women do not have civil rights, no education, can't own property, can't drive, and can't even vote. It's only a few of these countries are rich; most are very poor because women are kept at home and are restricted from contributing to the economy.

In Turkey, a country that wants to join the European Union, around 187,000 women are in polygamous marriages, according to a report carried out by AFP. However, Turkey is not the only country facing the issue of polygamy. Britain, Germany, and France are experiencing the same phenomenon.

For example, if Mr. Abdullai (Not referring to any person dead or alive) migrates from Turkey to live in Germany, France, Britain, or Belgium, with three wives, amongst the women, who is to be known as Mrs. Abdullai? 

And if each of the women is to give birth to four or five children each, totaling 20, who will be responsible for their welfare apart from the man? The government.

This is the reason Polygamy shouldn't be encouraged in Europe, because it drains the national coffers of a country, and could render a country's economy totally poor. 

Polygamy could drain the taxpayers' money and destroy a booming economy. That is the reason many countries practicing those polygamous marriages are virtually poor, and their people seek greener pastures in other European countries that do not permit that.

"ONE MAN, ONE WIFE" is the slogan. Intuitively, this makes a lot of sense.

PAUL GASCOIGNE IS THE RIGHT MAN TO HELP VICTIMS OF ALCOHOLISM

Paul Gascoigne: A great footballer who couldn't free himself from alcohol



If Britain needs to educate the youth and alcoholics against alcoholism, then Paul Gascoigne would be the best person to do this job. Experience is the best teacher, they say. Paul has been in alcoholism before and is now out of it. 


He has therefore acquired a certain experience that he could use to help other people who alcoholism is gradually being their toll on them.


I quote "I could drink a bottle of whiskey, but give me six cans and I will be drunk. It was getting too much for me. I was trying to fill my days doing my dad's garden or things for my mum, playing football on the street with my nephews." 

That is an emotional speech of once one of the best Britain's, or probably the world's, best footballers, Paul Gascoigne. At his highest peak, this great footballer's only problem was alcohol.

Paul Gascoigne couldn't leave alcohol alone, even though he knew alcohol and sports can't work together. Paul is quite happy about his present life after kicking alcohol. 

Paul Gascoigne's great moments on the field


He has just completed a three-month course at a Bournemouth center. The course has brought his awareness of an understanding of how alcohol can destroy one's life.

Even though alcohol ruined the career of Paul Gascoigne prematurely, he still has a lot to do to help people who are trying to fight against alcoholism without success. 

Paul, I know that you can do it. Happy to see you once again in the news with the best solution for your life.

ALCOHOLISM AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY MANUFACTURED IN BRITAIN

Britain: When alcohol takes its toll on you, where to sit or sleep doesn't matter.



Britain, no doubt, is a famous tourist country. Buckingham Palace, Big Ben, Number 10 Downing Street, etc., are places that make Britain unique in the tourism sector. 


But statistically, Britain is well known and famous too for the country's high percentage of alcohol consumption and the rise of teenage pregnancy.


Teenage pregnancy and alcoholism used to be social problems affecting Third World countries. For example, in Asia, Africa, and some parts of Latin America, poverty has escalated to alcoholism and underage prostitution.

The result is disastrous. Inexperienced mothers carrying babies and young boys fathering children instead of being in the classrooms. As a result of these problems, child delinquency is on the rise.

The question is, "Is Britain also a Third World country?" What is causing these problems? Inadequate sex education? Are most of the drinkers from broken homes? 

On the streets of Britain, it is very common on weekends to see young men and women stumbling through the streets with drinks. They drink without knowing their limit, and some sleep by the roadside and on pavements. Some are even raped and dumb.

The drunkards engage in brawls, violence, and public disorder, while the police toil in vain to maintain order and tend to those who need help. What a sick society Britain is turning into! 

During drinking hours, streets are littered with the refuse of empty bottles and cans. Answering nature's call is done everywhere without a second thought, resulting in the alleys and street corners stinking of urine. This is hazardous to public health.

Over the past years, the price of drinks has been inflated to prevent more alcohol consumption, but this is not working. Health experts say the availability of cheap alcohol at supermarkets is a major factor in this problem. 

Another point is how Britain wants youths to refrain from alcohol when most of their churches have been closed and turned to drink pubs?

According to statistics, the average Briton of 15 and older drinks the equivalent of about 11.2 liters of pure alcohol a year. 

The report said treating alcohol-related conditions cost the state-run health service about £2.7 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, almost double the cost in the year 2001. 

Pubs and supermarkets do not care about these anti-social problems. They are selling for money to pay their workers.

It is the task of the government to come out with good measures that could help to reduce this problem. Average alcohol consumption has fallen in many nations, but Britain remains the same.

Instead of Prime Minister Theresa May putting pressure on African leaders to legalize same-sex marriage, she has more problems in her own country to find solutions.