LITTLE BELGIUM BUT DIFFICULT TO BE GOVERNED

Belgium

Belgium is a relatively small country in Europe, covering an area of 30,528 square kilometers, with a population of about 11 million people, yet it is the most difficult country in the world to rule.

298 days after the general election in June last year, Belgium is still without a government, making it the only country without a leader for such a long period, after Iraq. One may like to know the reason such a small country can't find peace to elect a stable government for itself.

As a country with two main linguistic groups, the Dutch-speakers (Flemish) and the French-speakers (Walloons), agreement in power-sharing to rule Belgium hasn't been easy, as the country experiences rapid changes of government than any other country in Europe.

For example, the Flemish nationalists want more autonomy, even to create an independent state. This is not what any of the political parties, such as the Liberals and Christian Democrats, want. 

At the same time, even the socialists who reject cuts and demand higher taxes do not want a government without the Flemish Nationalists.

In my opinion, I don't see the reason a small country like Belgium should be divided by an autonomous government. The idea of the Nationalists creating an independent state is a plan they should suspend. 

Dividing Belgium by self-governing would create more problems than the happiness the Flemish Nationalists are looking for.

Who would like the situation in Belgium to be chronic without a solution like that of the Israelis and the Palestinians? At the moment, Belgium's financial situation isn't good. 

The country reduced its debt level from 130% of the gross domestic product in the 1990s to the current level of 96%, but this is still high.

It is a big task to form a stable government in Belgium, yet it is the responsibility of all the political leaders, such as Bart De Wever, Elio Di Rupo, Philip De Winter, and past leaders, such as Yves Leterme, Herman van Rompuy, etc, to find a lasting solution for this great country.

THE ANATOMY OF BELGIUM'S POLITICAL CRISIS

Brussels, the capital city of Belgium



"The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly"—Albert Einstein




History has once again repeated itself in Belgium's political history. Belgium has plunged into a new political crisis as the premier-elect, Yves Leterme, hands over his resignation letter to King Albert II after his Flemish Liberal Allies (VLD) quit the five-party coalition earlier on Thursday. 


In a similar crisis, the country was left without a permanent government from July 2007 to March 2008, when Leterme came to power.

Yves Leterme had a lot of responsibilities on his shoulders to tackle when he took his seat barely five months ago. One of the important tasks was to find a lasting solution to a long-running dispute between the Flemish-speaking and their counterpart French-speaking Wallonia.

In his effort to withdraw political boundaries between French and Flemish districts, the Flemish Liberal Party stood against it and split with Leterme. This is really a bad time for such a thing to happen when Belgium takes the seat of the European Union on 1 July 2010.

Even though Belgium is a relatively small country with a population of about 11 million, the country has never enjoyed a smooth or stable government from time to time because of the different opinions of its nationals, especially the Flemish-speaking communities. 

It is a well-known fact that the Flemish authorities actively discriminate against the Wallonians. In a civilized country like Belgium, this shouldn't happen. Tensions between the French and the majority of Dutch-speaking communities have risen in recent years as parties advocate full autonomy for wealthier, flourishing Flanders. 

Over the dispute that led to the resignation of Leterme, the Flemish-run communities on the outskirts of the capital have been trying to dissuade French speakers from moving in, largely by demanding they speak Dutch. 

The question is, does every Dutch person speak French? A language must not be imposed on someone before he or she becomes a recognized citizen of a country.

The French-speaking Belgians' effort or right to live in Flemish districts is considered an "invasion." "We want to preserve the Flemish of this beautiful town," says the mayor of Gooik. "We don't want it to be overwhelmed by people who speak different languages," says Michael Doomst. 

What kind of discriminatory statements are these in a democratic society? These were the kind of statements often heard in the former apartheid South Africa; now they are resurfacing in Belgium.

Until a permanent lasting solution is found for this long-running feud between the Flemish and Wallonia, Belgium will never ever enjoy a smooth running of government. What has happened in the past is just the tip of the iceberg. 

More political chaos would come. There is no peace in any country that does not have respect for its fellow citizens. The Flemish must change their character and approach to certain issues. 

Splitting Belgium is not the answer but unity. Whether French or Flemish, both are hundred percent Belgians.