Bushmen of Mozambique and Botswana demonstrating traditional survival skills in a hot, arid landscape.
It is passed but remains an era that can’t be forgotten,
as well as wounds that can't heal. In different historical periods, under
different regimes, Libya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia, Algeria, Congo,
Mozambique, and Angola are some of the African countries that flowed with a long trail of blood.
In an inconvenient truth, which can’t be erased, European
colonialists—Belgium, Spain, Holland, and Portugal, as well as Great Britain and
Germany, currently fighting against the coronavirus to protect their citizens—once
were terrorists that pillaged countries, subjected Africans to subhuman
conditions, and plundered the continent’s natural wealth.
This ruthless colonialism force, with an iron fist, erased,
buried in oblivion, and massacred civilians and set the cities and villages on
fire. Without sympathy, they displaced the populations and promoted ethnic
cleansing, sending thousands, including women and children, into their untimely
graves.
If the African continent had a voice, with effective and
competent leaders, or if foreign governments really cared about Africa, they
would have carried out research and documented all the crimes and
atrocities, including the opening of pregnant women’s bellies, impaled fetuses, the rape and torture of indigenous young people, and the carrying around of victims'
heads as trophies.
King Leopold II killed over ten million Africans and was later glorified with statues and streets named after him throughout Belgium. The Belgian government and the royal family think he deserves it because his
looting and crimes have made Belgium rich today.
These inhuman acts against humanity have all passed
unnoticed and unpunished because those who made the law are the breakers of the
law themselves, and at the same time, why should any foreign country get punished if crimes are committed against Black people?
That’s the nature of a world where elites never go to jail
for the crimes they commit against the underprivileged and poor people. That's
the nature of a world without the truth and a world where you'll lose all your
friends because of the truth. That's the nature of a world where you will be oppressed and cast out from society because of the truth.
The colonial masters and the US government destroyed everything in Africa, without achieving anything
significant for the continent. Even after giving Africa financial assistance,
they devised plans to take resources that are worth more than the financial assistance they give, since they control the world trade and tell Africans what
they want to pay.
Medical tragedies
The medical world is dangerous and
corrupt. Politicians and health professionals collaborate to commit medical crimes
against others because their goal is to generate profit and conquer, subdue, and
control the weak and the vulnerable, who appear mostly to be people in Third World countries.
But do we have to call victims of suppression weak?" Not at all; they are strong people. Because they are strong, the so-called
'superpower' fears their presence and does everything physically and medically
to subdue them.
There are reasons it has been the task of America and Western Europe to subdue
Africa and keep it under their control. To have power over Africa's rich
mineral resources, a suitable way to achieve this goal is to use slavery,
apartheid, colonization, and medical crimes.
This fact is confirmed after the independence of the Congo. The desperate and
disappointed Belgian government and the greedy royal family, not knowing how
the future of Belgium could be, collaborated with the CIA, and the newly elected Prime Minister of Congo, Patrice Lumumba, was murdered in cold blood.
HIV, the virus causing AIDS, is said to be transmitted in semen and blood and
originated in Africa. If this claim is true, why had HIV not depopulated
Africa at an earlier stage? Why had it not spread earlier to the
colonizer countries of Great Britain, France, Belgium, and Portugal?
All biological weapons and the deliberate spread of diseases in Africa are acts of revenge against Africa because Western Europe lost
Africa after independence swept through the continent. Zimbabwe was the last country to gain its independence in 1980, and after it was discovered that
thousands of the population had HIV/AIDS.
It's a shame for a particular continent to suffer at the hands of people who
have no regrets, conscience, or integrity, and actually feel proud of the crimes they have committed on the continent of Africa.
How do Africans live, and how do they survive every kind of tragedy? That should be the ultimate question for Europe and America
to give Africans the respect they deserve.
What Africans have experienced and survived has made them the toughest creatures on earth. National Geographic shows documentary
films showing how to survive without water or when lost in the desert.
Africans don't need lessons for survival. The bushmen in Mozambique and
Botswana will teach Bear Grylls how to survive in hot temperatures without food
and water for several days.
The Bushmen of the Kalahari Desert, who could
survive hard life in rough environments, are the pride of Africa when it comes to real survival, not
the fake ones shown on national television.
Hurting Africa, one must say that they tried to create an impression that
everything is normal because everyone was doing it, but that's not true. Apart
from America, the European countries that committed both physical and medical
crimes in Africa are Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Belgium; it is not the whole of Europe.
The expert scientists maintain that enslavement was a common inner-African practice. But enslavement was enhanced by European guns to kill, and the use of
bioweapons from Europe to weaken and change the minds of victims.
The widely claimed inner-African slave trade is a racist
myth. Accurate data are claimed to be hardly obtainable. There are
none.
Ninety percent of the captives perished on transports in
Africa. Dr. Livingston guessed that at least nine out of ten people died before being taken from the coast of Africa as slaves.
This is supposed to have been the result of tribal feuds and
headship practices customary in Africa. Africans, allegedly, sold
Africans or other Africans who had enslaved themselves.
Certainly, neither indigenous rulers nor traders were
able to or had the power to hold such murders and abductions
at that brutal rate. If this had been the case, Africa would have been
depopulated before the European-North American attacks.
Supposedly, the 30 million survivors let themselves be voluntarily sold by their African rulers into slavery. Slave
traders and slavery allegedly had been a gang and gift in Africa.
A supply of enslaved persons would be transported from the
interior of Africa to the coast of Africa through African slave traders. And
this surplus offer had allegedly sought to be taken over through European
handlers. But every sixth slave ship was destroyed by people living on the
coast.
For the men hunting from East Africa, in children's books
and scientific articles, the Black evildoers were replaced by Arabs or
Arab-Muslim slave hunters.
Allegedly, they had taken, since 652 AD, 17 million
slaves for slavery in Islamic countries. The men from non-Muslim
specialists in Abyssinia and Upper Egypt were allegedly castrated.
Children of enslaved African women and Arabian slaveholders would have been killed. That should be the reason that rather few
dark-skinned people are living in the former Arab slave states.
The chief editor of "Charlie Hebdo," Stephane
Charbonnier, accused the Muslim Arabs of being the creators of slavery. He
denied “that the Jews had started the slave trade; everyone knows that it
was the Muslim Arabs.” The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung paid tribute to this
assertion.
