The HIV-AIDS virus
Shedding light on the dishonorable record of Dr. Anthony
Fauci – A real Dr. Mengle
"If the current AIDS theory and treatment policy are wrong, then to me, it means what Fauci has done over an extended period of time dwarfs what Dr. Mengele SS Nazi, did in his day."
AIDS: Multiple
Sex Partners; Multiple STDs; Multiple Antibiotics; MultipleDrugs: Poppers,
Cocaine, Heroin, Crac; Multiple infections; Deficient Diet leads to compromised
immunity, result = AIDS
It is indisputable
that if an individual is homosexual and has extremely close contact with a lot of
people, the number of infectious organisms that this individual’s immune system
is going to have to deal with will be higher.
If this person has
300 sexual contacts a year – with people who themselves are each having 300
contacts a year – that’s 90,000 times more opportunity for infections than a person
involved in an exclusive relationship.
In the 1970s, we had
a significant number of highly mobile, promiscuous men sharing bodily fluids
and fast lifestyles and drugs. It was probable that such homosexuals would be
exposed to nearly every infectious organism that has lived with humans.
Science, as it is
practiced today in the world, is largely not science at all.
MY HIV/AIDS INVESTIGATION, AND PARALLELS TO THE COVID
HOAX BY JON RAPPORT (March 8, 2021)
In my current series
of articles on fake epidemics—Ebola, Zika, Swine Flu—I’ve established that all
the symptoms of these so-called diseases can be explained without invoking a
virus.
THIS IS A KEY
It was my method when I wrote my first book, AIDS INC., in 1988. At that time, I looked into the AIDS “high-risk
groups” listed by the CDC—Africans, Haitians, IV drug users, gay men,
hemophiliacs, and blood-transfusion recipients—and I showed that
the immune-system collapse (the hallmark of AIDS) in these groups could be
explained without the need to refer to HIV at all.
“AIDS” was not one condition.
It was an immune deficiency caused, in various people, by a variety of factors. The
hypnotic medical trick was welding all these sick and dying people together
under one umbrella label: “AIDS.”
But the truth was—depending on which “AIDS group” and which
individuals you were looking at—you had debilitating medical and street drugs
destroying immune systems; you had devastating hunger and starvation; lack of
basic sanitation; grinding poverty and war; vaccination campaigns; adrenal
collapse…
Likewise, today,
with a vast relabeling effort, any patient with any sort of lung problem or
flu-like illness, .diagnoses. can be diagnosed and repackaged as a case of “COVID-19.” The loosest set of so-called COVID symptoms allows for such fraudulent and deceptive
diagnoses
THIS IS THE CENTRAL CON
Back in 1988, after
combing through medical journals, I found that the number-one cause of T-cell
depletion (immune-system collapse) in the world was malnutrition/hunger/starvation. Yet, in Africa and Haiti,
and even in certain Western patients surviving on junk-food diets, T-cell
depletion was routinely called
HIV/AIDS.
Suddenly, a virus was invoked to substitute for
malnutrition,
In fact, in Africa,
the earlier label for AIDS was “slim disease.” That fatuous idea was invented via a deeply flawed investigation in Uganda, where the
patients were “slim” simply because they were malnourished and
starving, and consequently losing weight.
In New York and San Francisco, some gay men were inhaling a brutally
dangerous street drug called “poppers.” Severe lung damage has been just one of the drug’s many devastating effects. Profound immune-system deficiency
was sure to follow.
In AIDS INC., I laid out a whole parade of immune-system destroyers in the high-risk groups, and none of these
destroyers have anything to do with a virus.
—Just as in Wuhan, in 2019, the deadliest chronic air pollution hanging
over the city and causing pneumonia—the original hallmark of so-called
COVID-19—had nothing to do with a virus.
So when uninformed
people bleat, “People are dying, it must be the virus,” whether
they’re talking about AIDS or COVID, they’re completely off the rails and on
the wrong track.
Here is another parallel between AIDS and COVID: the
test for the virus
I’ve spent many
articles detailing how the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 spits out false-positive
results like water from a fire hose. A doctor will tell a patient he’s infected
simply because the sensitivity of the test is so jacked up it’ll register positive
on a speck of dust on the moon. This is an artificial case-number building at its
finest.
Well, back in 1988, there was a similar situation. The HIV antibody
test was turning out a Niagara of false-positive results. I devoted a chapter
in my book to the results of my extensive medical journal ELISA search.
The evidence was undeniable. Both basic types of HIV antibody testsELISAElisa and the Western Blot, were admittedly, deeply flawed. There was no gold
standard for testing.
Cross-reactions were
abundant: the test for HIV would come up positive for a whole host of reasons
that had nothing to do with HIV or any other virus.
ONE REASON?
A person had received the hepatitis B vaccination. Well, in the 1980s,
a campaign was launched to recruit gay men into a large study of the new
vaccine.
A third parallel between AIDS and COVID: expanding the definition of
the “disease” to rope in as many patients, and build up as
many case numbers, as possible.
The 1987 CDC definition of AIDS, which I printed in my book in full,
took up 15 pages. With a bit of a rigmarole, a doctor could diagnose AIDS in a
person who had almost any kind of bacterial infection.
The CDC definition of COVID-19 allows a diagnosis when the patient has
nothing more than a cough, or chills and fever, accompanied by a positive PCR
test.
There are other parallels between AIDS and COVID I could list, but you
get the picture. In both instances, the hoax is rampant.
A few years after I
published AIDS INC., I became aware of a new argument: the
very existence of HIV was in doubt. Consulting the independent literature on
the subject, I became convinced that no one has proven that HIV exists.
In these pages, I’ve
published several times an illuminating interview journalist Christine
Johnson conducted with Australian biophysicist Eleni Papadopulos about HIV
isolation. Papadopulos makes a compelling case that, according to rigorous
rules laid down by mainstream researchers, HIV hasn’t been isolated.
As my readers know,
for the past year, I’ve been offering compelling evidence that SARS-COV-2 has
never been proven to exist. Researchers twist and reverse the meaning of the
word “isolation” to demonstrate the virus is real.
The non-existence of HIV and SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t surprise me. After all,
the so-called symptoms of both “conditions” can be explained without
reference to a virus.
In both cases, the reality that lights up like a giant neon sign in the darkness. Is FRAUD.
KARY MULLIS, NOBEL PRIZE WINNER IN CHEMISTRY
The following was
written by Kary Mullis for the introduction to the book "Inventing the
AIDS Virus" by Peter H. Duesberg (Regnery Publishing, Inc., Washington, DC,
1996):
In 1988, I was working as a consultant at Specialty
Labs in Santa Monica, CA, setting up analytic routines for the Human
Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). I knew a lot about setting up analytic routines
for anything with nucleic acids in it because I invented the Polymerase Chain
Reaction. That's why they hired me.
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), on the other hand, was something I did not know a lot about. Thus, when I found myself
writing a report on our progress and goals for the project, sponsored by the
National Institutes of Health, I recognized that I did not know the scientific
reference to support a statement I had just written: "HIV is the probable
cause of AIDS."
So I turned to the virologist at the next desk, a reliable and competent fellow, and asked him for
the reference. He said I didn't need one. I disagreed. While it's true that
certain scientific discoveries or techniques are so well established that their
sources are no longer referenced in the contemporary literature, that didn't
seem to be the case with the HIV/AIDS connection.
It was totally remarkable to
me that the individual who had discovered the cause of a deadly and as-yet-uncured disease would not be continually referenced in the scientific
papers until that disease was cured and forgotten. But as I would soon learn,
the name of that individual - who would surely be Nobel material - was on the
tip of no one's tongue.
Of course, this simple reference had to be out there
somewhere. Otherwise, tens of thousands of public servants and esteemed
scientists of many callings, trying to solve the tragic deaths of a large
number of homosexual and/or intravenous (IV) drug-using men between the ages of
twenty-five and forty, would not have allowed their research to settle into one narrow channel of investigation.
Everyone wouldn't fish in the same pond unless it was well established
that all the other ponds were empty. There had to be a published paper, or
perhaps several of them, which, taken together, indicated that HIV was the
probable cause of AIDS. There just had to be.
I did computer searches but came up with nothing. Of
course, you can miss something important in computer searches by not putting in
just the right keywords. To be certain about a scientific issue, it's best to
ask other scientists directly. That's one thing that scientific conferences in
faraway places with nice beaches are for.
I was going to a lot of meetings and conferences as part
of my job. I got in the habit of approaching anyone who gave a talk about AIDS
and asking him or her what reference I should quote for that increasingly
problematic statement, "HIV is the probable cause of AIDS."
After ten or fifteen meetings over a couple of years, I was
getting pretty upset when no one could cite the reference. I didn't like the
ugly conclusion that was forming in my mind: The entire campaign against a
disease increasingly regarded as a twentieth-century Black Plague was based on
a hypothesis whose origins no one could recall. That defied both scientific and
common sense.
Finally, I had an opportunity to question one of the
giants in HIV and AIDS research, DL Luc Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute,
when he gave a talk in San Diego. It would be the last time I would be able to
ask my little question without showing anger, and I figured Montagnier would
know the answer. So I asked him.
With a look of condescending puzzlement, Montagnier said,
"Why don't you quote the report from the Centers for Disease Control?
"
I replied, "It doesn't really address the issue of
whether or not HIV is the probable cause of AIDS, does it?"
"No," he admitted, no doubt wondering when I
would just go away. He looked for support to the little circle of people around
him, but they were all awaiting a more definitive response like I was.
"Why don't you quote the work on SIV [Simian
Immunodeficiency Virus]?" the good doctor offered.
"I read that too, DL Montagnier," I responded.
"What happened to those monkeys didn't remind me of AIDS. Besides, that
paper was just published, a couple of months ago. I'm looking for the
original paper where somebody showed that HIV caused AIDS.
This time, DL Montagnier's response was to walk quickly
away to greet an acquaintance across the room.
Cut to the scene inside my car just a few years ago. I was
driving from Mendocino to San Diego. Like everyone else by now, I knew a lot
more about AIDS than I wanted to. But I still didn't know who had determined
that it was caused by HIV. Getting sleepy as I came over the San Bernardino
Mountains, I switched on the radio and tuned in a guy who was talking about
AIDS.
His name was Peter Duesberg, and he was a prominent virologist at
Berkeley. I'd heard of him, but had never read his papers or heard him speak.
But I listened, now wide awake, while he explained exactly why I was having so
much trouble finding the references that linked HIV to AIDS. There weren't any.
No one had ever proved that HIV causes AIDS.
When I got home, I invited Duesberg down to San Diego to present his
ideas to a meeting of the American Association for Chemistry. Mostly skeptical
at first, the audience stayed for the lecture, and then an hour of questions,
and then stayed talking to each other until requested to clear the room.
Everyone left with more questions than they had brought.
I like and respect Peter Duesberg. I don't think he knows
necessarily what causes AIDS; we have disagreements about that. But we're both
certain about what doesn't cause AIDS.
We have not been able to discover any good reasons why
most of the people on earth believe that AIDS is a disease caused by a virus
called HIV. There is simply no scientific evidence demonstrating that this is
true.
We have also not been able to discover why doctors
prescribe a toxic drug called AZT (Zidovudine) to people who have no other
complaint other than the fact that they have the presence of antibodies to HIV
in their blood. In fact, we cannot understand why humans would take this drug
for any reason.
We cannot understand how all this madness came about, and
having both lived in Berkeley, we've seen some strange things indeed. We know
that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake.
I say this rather strongly as a warning.
Duesberg has been saying it for a long time.
SHEDDING LIGHT ON THE DISHONORABLE RECORD OF DR. FAUCI –
A REAL DR. MENGLE
By F. William Engdahl
Dramatic political and social decisions are being made across the United States and around the world on what emergency quarantine measures and
other steps must be taken. In many cases, the radical and severe measures, such
as shutting down the world economy, are being justified by the COVID-19 case
projections of morbidity in the future.
If there is one person who is the face of the current strategy of
dealing with the coronavirus in Washington, it is the Director of the US
National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the NIH, Dr.
Tony Fauci.
What major media conveniently leave out in discussing Fauci’s role
is his highly controversial and conflicted history since he first joined NIAID
in 1984 during the beginnings of the AIDS panic. His role then sheds valuable
light on his remarkable and highly controversial actions today.
Tony Fauci, a leading member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, is being promoted by
major US media such as CNN, MSNBC, and the New York Times as the greatest expert on all things coronavirus-related to the COVID-19 outbreak.
He had dismissed the
President’s efforts to promote a known malaria medication as treatment for
severe coronavirus patients as “anecdotal,” even though seven years before, he
backed the same drug.
He has publicly
taken projections from an institute created in Washington State by the Gates
Foundation, the same foundation that virtually owns the WHO and owns major
stakes in the leading vaccine makers, to claim that up to 200,000
Americans could die from COVID-19.
Fauci stated that COVID-19 is “probably about
10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu,” which would mean 300-600,000
coronavirus deaths this year. At the same time, in a respected medical journal, he compared Covid-19 as similar to seasonal flu in morbidity.
When questioned how
long the shutdown of much of the US economy must last, Fauci replied only when
there are zero new COVID-19 positive tested cases, something impossible given the
defective testing. He has also backed direct human tests of novel
vaccines with no prior animal tests, including radical, non-tested
mRNA gene-edited vaccines.
Fauci has more
influence over US national policy on the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic than
anyone, including the President. Much of the media treats him with awe as an
unimpeachable scientist, one of the world’s finest. A closer look at Anthony
Fauci’s career gives a starkly different picture, a very alarming one in fact.
America’s AIDS Czar
Tony Fauci has held
the top post at the NIAID in Washington for an astonishing 36 years. Today, he is well past retirement age at 79 and holds the funds to determine
which drug companies or university researchers will get precious government
funds or not from NIAID’s annual $5 billion budget.
Dr. Robert Gallo
Let’s go back to
1984, when Fauci was named head of NIAID during the Reagan era. That year, an
AIDS researcher, Robert Gallo, working under Fauci, held a press conference to
announce that he had “discovered” the AIDS virus. He said it was HIV- human
immunodeficiency virus.
The shocking announcement, which went around the world, was in complete disregard of
scientific procedures of prior peer-reviewed published scientific evidence,
including the required electron microscope analyses.
It was a case of
“science by press conference,” as a critical scientist, Prof. Peter H.
Duesberg, described it. Duesberg was an award-winning researcher at Berkeley who isolated the first cancer gene through his work on retroviruses in 1970 and
mapped the genetic structure of these viruses.
For Gallo and Fauci,
that was unimportant as millions in research funds flowed into NIAID to
research the new virus, HIV. Fauci and Gallo claimed that AIDS was highly
contagious, also by sexual transmission, especially among homosexual men.
Notably, before the
Gallo claims to have found the HIV AIDS virus, NIAID had been doing
research on the role of drugs, poppers or nitrites, proven immunosuppressants,
in the deaths of the earliest AIDS patients. That was quickly dropped in favor
of researching a “cure” for AIDS. The media were told that AIDS was the “public health threat of the Century.”
Gallo went on to
make millions on his patented blood test for HIV, even though the test was often giving false positives and did not test directly for the alleged virus, but for active antibodies, something immunology practice said was not
valid, as antibodies merely suggested a past infection response and not
necessarily the presence of HIV. At this time in the 1980s, Fauci was responsible
for AIDS research at NIAID, a post he still holds.
False Tests?
The issue of
HIV/AIDS tests is central. While a frightening world was clamoring for a test,
Gallo and Fauci promoted their deeply flawed tests of antibodies. In 2006, Gallo
claimed, “HIV tests were highly accurate from the time they were developed in
1984 and have become much more accurate over time…”
Highly accurate in 1984, but
more accurate than highly over time? Gallo added in response to criticism, “A
PCR test for the presence of the virus itself can accurately determine a
child’s HIV status.”
In a sharp rebuttal
of the Gallo claims, claims endorsed by Fauci and the NIAID as well as CDC,
Roberto A. Giraldo, MD and Etienne de Harven, MD, the scientist who produced
the first electron micrograph of a retrovirus pointed out that both the ELISA
and Western blot, and a genetic test, the PCR or ‘Viral Load’ test,” the two
major tests used to determine if one has AIDS, are invalid.
“None of these tests
detects the HIV itself, nor do they detect HIV particles.” They add that
there are “more than 70 different documented conditions that can cause the antibody
tests to react positively without an HIV infection.”
Among the false-positive
cases are influenza, the common cold, leprosy, and the existence
of pregnancy. The same tests are used today to determine
SARS-CoV-2 positivity.
They concluded,
“The fact that after
25 years of intense research, HIV has been neither isolated nor purified in
terms of classical virology indicates to us that the infectious view of AIDS as
a contagious viral disease is based on an apparently non-existent microbe!”
Giraldo and de Harven
declared, “The alleged existence of HIV was asserted from the study of
proteins, reverse transcriptase activity (RT), and RNA fragments that were
found in culture supernatants, not from the direct analysis of purified viral particles.” The CDC requires a positive antibody test for HIV to determine AIDS
in the USA. Yet in Africa, since 1985, the WHO requires no HIV test or any other
laboratory test. Merely the patient’s symptoms that can include weight
loss, chronic diarrhea, prolonged fever, persistent cough, and such, symptoms
endemic to chronic poverty, malnutrition, and lack of sanitation.
Yet this fraud has
shaped the career of Tony Fauci for more than 35 years. Fauci, as head of
NIAID, has taken millions from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well
as the Clinton Foundation, along with tens of billions from US taxpayers, for this
bogus research. Suspiciously, the 2006 article by Giraldo and de Harven was
suddenly retracted by the journal in 2019, just before the coronavirus Wuhan
outbreak.
Even though he knew the established rules of virology, Fauci, as head of NIAID, recommended
the Burroughs Wellcome chemotherapy drug, AZT, as a “preventive drug” for
HIV diagnosed patients even without symptoms! Burroughs Wellcome gave NIAID the
study that was deliberately biased for AZT.
Fauci even backed AZT for pregnant
women despite the grave risk to the fetus. One mark of pregnancy in all women
is a higher level of antigens as the natural immune system fights any infection
to protect the fetus. AZT or Retrovir, a failed leukemia
drug, has been proven to be a highly toxic drug.
It was approved for AIDS testing in a
record 5 days by Fauci and the US Government in 1987. Today, despite more than thirty years of funding research and billions of dollars, no effective
vaccine for HIV/AIDS exists.
Fauci and Gilead
According to people
who have studied the role of Tony Fauci as head of NIAID, his focus has been
what is called scientific reductivism, described as “a 19th-century-style, single-germ theory for a complex web of factors that collapsed
the immune systems of a subset of gay men in the early 1980s.”
He has refused
to explore the documentation that a variety of lethal drugs and other toxins, such as nitrites, could play a role. As a result, he has wasted tens of
billions of taxpayer dollars since 1984 on dead-end experiments. One of his
most nefarious was his collaboration with Gilead Sciences.
Not satisfied with
having developed a false positive test for AIDS and having gained FDA
fast-track approval for AZT to treat HIV-positive patients with serious illness
symptoms, Fauci decided to collaborate with Gilead (as in the Biblical “balm of
Gilead”) on what came to be called PrEP experiments.
Fauci promoted Truvada (AZT) as a prophylactic against. The AIDS virus
Fauci, in 2007, began to finance clinical trials of the AZT drugs in HIV “negatives,” on
the theory that the chemotherapy would “protect” them from
becoming “positive.” That is, testing toxic HIV drugs on
otherwise healthy persons to “ensure” they never get AIDS.
If it sounds mad, it
was. Gilead supplied the drug Truvada to NIAID between 2007-2012 for Phase
III human tests for HIV-negative subjects. Four tests of at least 2,000 and up
to 5,000 test subjects each were done.
The project was
called “pre-exposure prophylaxis” or “PrEP.” Healthy subjects were given doses
of the chemotherapy drug Truvada, according to the thesis, which could prevent them from one day
getting HIV-positive. CDC, in its May 2014 recommendation, urged
physicians to prescribe Truvada for negatives in the so-called “risk
groups,” an official government imprimatur for an extremely
profitable drug.
The FDA ignored two
of the four Truvada tests that had failed and been halted. Despite that
and owing to data manipulation by Fauci’s NIAID and Gilead, the FDA approved
the dangerous Truvada for PrEP. Today, Gilead lists the side effects of Truvada:
Kidney problems,
including kidney failure; worsening Hepatitis B; too much lactic acid in your
blood (lactic acidosis), which can lead to death; severe liver problems, which
can lead to death; and bone problems.
They state that Truvada:
“can help
reduce the risk of getting HIV-1 through sex, when taken every day and used
together with safer sex practices.”
The Fauci-Gilead
scam of promoting Truvada for healthy people to “reduce risk” of
HIV is a marker for the level of medical malpractice and, in some cases, evident
criminal abuse of human health that the current White House coronavirus guru,
A. Fauci, represents.
Fauci and COVID-19
In October 2019, Fauci and his NIAID got $100 million from the Gates Foundation to develop
“gene-based” therapies for HIV and sickle cell disease. That means at the time
of the first claims of novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China, Fauci was
still promoting a 35-year fraud around HIV.
Fauci is also part
of the Gates Foundation cabal. In 2012, Fauci was named one of the
five Leadership Council of the Gates Foundation-created Global Vaccine Action
Plan.
This is highly
relevant to his role today as the Trump Administration coronavirus “pope.” Has
his NIAID or any other laboratory in the world rigorously, with electron microscopy,
isolated and purified samples of patients tested SARS-CoV-2 positive for
Covid-19? Or are the virus proofs as faulty as Fauci and the AIDS clique have
made for HIV?
In addition, NIAID is
working with Gilead to conduct Phase II human trials on Gilead’s drug,
remdesivir, as a potential treatment for hospitalized adult patients diagnosed
with COVID-19.
A Coincidence?
Relevant also is the
fact that all top scientific advisers to the US President’s Task Force on
COVID-19 are tied for decades to the bogus and destructive HIV/AIDS research
and propagation of false theories. Alongside Tony Fauci of NIAID stands
Deborah L. Birx, M.D., Obama appointee as US Global AIDS Coordinator, who worked under Tony Fauci at NIAID from 1983-1986.
Robert Redfield is
the current Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the center
of the recent coronavirus testing scandal. Redfield cofounded with the
discredited Robert Gallo, a former Fauci colleague in the AIDS scandals of the early 1980s at NIH, the Institute of Human Virology based at the University of
Maryland. Redfield and Birx also co-authored numerous scientific articles on purported HIV vaccines, none of which have been effective.
Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention
Fauci, Birx, and
Redfield, all incestuously complicit in the HIV/AIDS frauds and malpractice,
today hold the future of not only American public health but also of the
entire world economy in their hands. Not a good situation.
As they work on the proven HIV=IDS fraud, the coronavirus tests do not at all prove the presence of a deadly virus in any patient. If this is so, it is perhaps the
greatest criminal fraud in medical history.
F. William Engdahl is a strategic risk consultant and lecturer. He holds a degree in
politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and
geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
COMMENT:
Gary Wilson • 10 months ago
In 1992, I first
learned about AIDS by buying the book, "The Great Aids Hoax", by
T.C. Fry. I contacted Mr. Fry by phone and had an interesting conversation. He
stated that he also found the conversation interesting. I then contacted Peter
Duesberg by email, and in it I asked him how he liked being a modern-day
Galileo.
He actually phoned
me, and he sent me a large body of evidence to review. I also bought Robert
Gallo's book about aids, "Virus Hunting". Based on
the evidence from Gallo and Duesberg, I concluded that HIV cannot cause AIDS. For me to change my opinion, I would need to read
a published, peer-reviewed study proving that HIV causes Aids.
There is no such
study. I attended a talk by Kary Mullis when he came to town. In his talk, he
mentioned that when he was applying for a grant to study HIV, he asked what the
scientific reference was for HIV as the cause of AIDS. When he found that there
was no scientific reference, he declined to apply for the grant.
I made 25 or so copies of Duesberg's body of
evidence and talked to many local AIDS organizations, leaving them a copy of
Duesberg's body of evidence. It was clear to me that my effort made no
difference to their opinion. I found people often attacked Duesberg, but never
attacked his evidence. I guess when you can't refute the evidence, you attack
the person.
I certainly know
from my investigations who Fauci is. All treatment for AIDS is directed
at the virus, and the treatments are toxic and immunosuppressing. These
treatments are given to immunodeficient patients!
The immune deficiency in AIDS is acquired, which means
you were not born with it. It doesn't mean you were infected with it by
another person.
If the current
AIDS theory and treatment policy is wrong, then to me, it means what Fauci has
done over an extended period of time dwarfs what Dr. Mengele SS Nazi, did in his
day.
When Fauci is the leading expert on COVID-19, you don't
need to tell me something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
BILL
GATES' EBOLA CONFESSION, WHICH WAS IGNORED BY THE MEDIA (Sunday, February 19,
2017)
Bill Gates: The incarnation of Dr. Jekyll among us?
“We’ve created,
in terms of spread, the most dangerous environment that we’ve ever had in the
history of mankind,”- Gates
tells Vox.
Microsoft co-founder
Bill Gates argues that something is going to decimate humans, killing
millions. It’s not nuclear war. In an exclusive interview with Ezra Klein
in Vox, Gates said, “I rate the chance of a nuclear
war within my lifetime as being fairly low.”
It’s also not
a “big volcanic explosion, gigantic earthquake, [or an] asteroid,”
because the probability is, as he said, “very low.”
So what’s going to
kill us? Gates predicts a virus or some sort of outbreak.
On Ebola, Bill Gates
said, “We’ve created, in terms of spread, the most dangerous environment
that we’ve ever had in the history of mankind,”- Gates tells Vox.
And also said:
“I rate the
chance of a widespread epidemic, far worse than Ebola, in my lifetime, as well
over 50%.”
Some comments are
incriminating and can put someone in an awkward position. Every
intelligent person or the media could gather evidence of the statement by the 59-year-old successful businessman that Ebola was created.
Like always, the aim
of the media today is to misinform, to manipulate, twist, and hide facts from
the public over diseases just to keep their jobs to feed their families. The
implicating statement was let go by the media without questioning Gates.
Showing concern over
a possible outbreak of a disease in the next few decades, Bill Gates said, “I
rate the chance of a nuclear war within my lifetime as being fairly low. I rate
the chance of a widespread epidemic, far worse than Ebola, in my lifetime, as
well over 50%.”
“It’s especially
terrifying, given the way we reacted to the last epidemic: The Ebola outbreak
of last year showed how unready the world is to deal with infectious
disease.”
“The last widespread killer epidemic was the Spanish Flu. Between 1918 and 1919, it
killed between 20 million and 40 million people worldwide, more than World War
I. What’s even more frightening, Gates says, is that we don’t even know where
the Spanish Flu came from; it was just called the “Spanish Flu” because the
press in Spain were the first to report on it.”
The need for Bill
Gates to be worried is necessary. I quote: “We don’t know where the Spanish Flu came from, it was just called “The
Spanish Flu” because the press in Spain were the first to report on it.”
But certainly, Bill Gates knew where Ebola came from because the virus was
created by America, Russia, and Germany for biological warfare purposes, long
before it exploded in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Congo, and Guinea.
I wasn’t surprised
at all when the business tycoon ended his talks with Vox, saying, “We’ve
created, in terms of spread, the most dangerous environment that we’ve ever had
in the history of mankind.”
Let World Leaders and America continue to fool the people, but they can’t
continue fooling the people all the time. Over the truth of Aids and Ebola,
time will tell.
Posted by Johan van Dongen/ Joel Savage/ Wolff Geisler at 2:51 AM Labels: Bill Gates, Biological warfare, Ebola, Ezra Klein,
